-
Poster
-
-
05-03-2006, 05:46 PM
Guides and Tutorials -
#52
-
-
08-08-2006, 10:40 PM
Guides and Tutorials -
#53
n00b
I've tried EAC given all the positive coverage it gets from the all the mp3 enthusiast sites (this one included) but when you could choose between ripping at 30 - 40x or 1.8 - 2.4x (inner-outer, same CD) there is no choice surely? Yes, audiograbber works perfectly fine for me, its quicker, easier to use and infinately more user friendly. Take the time it listen to the music once ripped to ensure there are no skips/distortions - and if there is then use EAC. From experience I've found that you can tell when audiograbber will possibly struggle ripping a track 100%; it slows down to a much slower than normal ripping rate. You could count the times this has happened in one hand, over 2 years! I guess if you take good care of your CDs (or your freinds take good care of theirs!) you'll be minimising any potential problems.
-
-
10-24-2006, 12:47 PM
Guides and Tutorials -
#54
Belgian Waffle Lover
still using audiograbber, but i doubt that prog is still the latest in town
-
-
12-22-2006, 10:44 PM
Guides and Tutorials -
#55
KayaKer
im using Cdex its a cool warez...
-
-
01-27-2007, 11:18 PM
Guides and Tutorials -
#56
crockett scientist
BT Rep: +2
oh no I'm still on audiograbber
-
-
03-26-2007, 10:54 PM
Guides and Tutorials -
#57
mog
i use EAC to rip
lame 3.97 w/ V0 as the preset to compress
i had to use guides to set it all up but i'm so glad i did
it's what they recommend on places like oink
-
-
04-06-2007, 01:57 AM
Guides and Tutorials -
#58
Poster
BT Rep: +3
you should be using -V2 --vbr-new
It produces better quality faster than vbr old
-
-
04-07-2007, 04:06 AM
Guides and Tutorials -
#59
Member
I'm using foobar2000, because I like listening music by this player =)
-
-
04-29-2007, 12:57 PM
Guides and Tutorials -
#60
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks