DWK; what you should narrow down is the methodology of a particular benchmark and what the scoring criteria are before you make such a generalization.Originally posted by DWk@23 February 2004 - 19:33
Even though I know I'll get LOTS of bad replies for what I'm gonna say.... benchies don't say what a computer can and cannot. If the app (game) runs fine with this and that turned on (left out on purpose), why do scores matter?
Just play the games and have fun
I particularly like the Aquamark3 benchmark. Why? For many reasons.
I like the fact that the krass engine uses DX7, DX8, and DX9 textures whose performance is a function of the GPU's pixel and vertex shaders. If you run the benchmark, you are able to see your graphics card stressed out in different situations which integrate all three types of textures.
Therefore you can see where your card performs better and where it lags. The great thing about the comparison links is the fact that it details maximum, minimum, and average frames per second, which denote strengths and weaknesses of a card in a particular scene/environment.
I suggest you upgrade someday soon to a modern GPU which features pixel and vertex shaders so you could contribute to this discussion. I only say this to emphasize the fact the Aquamark3 and other such rigorous benchmarks test the performance of these elements of modern graphics hardware---not "value segment" hardware.
Bookmarks