Go Back In Time.....

[bigboab]

Originally posted by I.am@29 February 2004 - 01:08
even the reference pointer to that database is not available

Dont delude yourself. The reference point has been there since the concept of the modern computer. I myself did a lecture once on this concept. That was in 1989. the database size has not yet been reached. The concept is that simple you would not believe it.

[internet.news]

Originally posted by bigboab+29 February 2004 - 00:12--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (bigboab @ 29 February 2004 - 00:12)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-I.am@29 February 2004 - 01:08
even the reference pointer to that database is not available

Dont delude yourself. The reference point has been there since the concept of the modern computer. I myself did a lecture once on this concept. That was in 1989. the database size has not yet been reached. The concept is that simple you would not believe it. [/b][/quote]
1988 I think you&#39;ll find

[I.am]

Originally posted by bigboab+28 February 2004 - 18:12--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (bigboab @ 28 February 2004 - 18:12)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-I.am@29 February 2004 - 01:08
even the reference pointer to that database is not available

Dont delude yourself. The reference point has been there since the concept of the modern computer. I myself did a lecture once on this concept. That was in 1989. the database size has not yet been reached. The concept is that simple you would not believe it. [/b][/quote]
Please elaborate, sounds interesting.

[bujub22]

here&#39;s yah time machine first 1 in the seat gets to go first

[djweiser]

nice to read about what others thought of this, thanks

[tralalala]

heres one of the best theories to the fact no one will ever travel in time.

if people can travel in time, how come is it that no one from the future has ever visited us?



tralalala

p.s: Jonnos theory is scary too

[4th gen]

No doubt it&#39;s already been said, but you can&#39;t travel faster than the speed of light. Thus rendering the first post a moot point, in effect

[tralalala]

Originally posted by 4th gen@29 February 2004 - 16:12
No doubt it&#39;s already been said, but you can&#39;t travel faster than the speed of light. Thus rendering the first post a moot point, in effect

why is this 4th gen?

could you explaine please?



tralalala

[internet.news]

Originally posted by tralalala+29 February 2004 - 13:14--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (tralalala @ 29 February 2004 - 13:14)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-4th gen@29 February 2004 - 16:12
No doubt it&#39;s already been said, but you can&#39;t travel faster than the speed of light. Thus rendering the first post a moot point, in effect

why is this 4th gen?

could you explaine please?



tralalala [/b][/quote]
Try it and you&#39;ll see what happens

[4th gen]

Originally posted by tralalala+29 February 2004 - 13:14--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (tralalala @ 29 February 2004 - 13:14)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-4th gen@29 February 2004 - 16:12
No doubt it&#39;s already been said, but you can&#39;t travel faster than the speed of light. Thus rendering the first post a moot point, in effect

why is this 4th gen?

could you explaine please?



tralalala [/b][/quote]
As any massive object increases in velocity, it&#39;s mass (relativistic mass) also increases. The mass increases exponentially towards infinity when the object reaches the speed of light. Of course, the object can&#39;t reach the speed of light, as the force required to accelerate a body of almost infinite mass is far too high to be supplied by us.