Man Gets 30 Months For Misspelling

[MagicNakor]

Because he's trying to make money. Which he apparently did quite successfully.

If your business is built upon the mistakes of others, you target the people who make the most mistakes.

[VaVaVoom]

What a truly evil man.

He'll do 18 months in some C catagory gazebo. Then he'll be at large to indulge his sick fantasies. He has more or less made an art out his cruel self-amusement.

We'll see more cases like this and that bastard will be pulling his wire to it.

[Keikan]

Cleaned.

Image Resized
[img]http://keikan.250free.com/cleaned.jpg' width='200' height='120' border='0' alt='click for full size view'>

[j2k4]

Originally posted by MagicNakor@29 February 2004 - 10:49
Because he's trying to make money. Which he apparently did quite successfully.

If your business is built upon the mistakes of others, you target the people who make the most mistakes.

This is exactly, precisely, and unfortunately correct.

Once upon a time, the manipulation of the hoi polloi didn't extend so easily to innocents; now we have the internet.

Funny-

Those who champion freedom of speech at all costs, and preach taking the bad with the good are pronouncing a death sentence on any number of children.

The world is a dangerous place; I guess it's only right that children should face their fair share of the risk, huh?

[Rat Faced]

Originally posted by j2k4@1 March 2004 - 16:07
Funny-

Those who champion freedom of speech at all costs, and preach taking the bad with the good are pronouncing a death sentence on any number of children.

The world is a dangerous place; I guess it's only right that children should face their fair share of the risk, huh?

The bastard deserves everything he gets and more.


However, those of us with children walk a fine line, as you well know.

I for one, would rather my son found out everything is not what it seems through getting on some pervs website than through getting in his car.


They have to learn "street smarts" at some point.... personally, id rather they learnt it where i can keep an eye on things and 'shout n bawl' a little...

ie i'll take the "Freedom of Speech" rather than the drug rehab, if its all the same with you

[j2k4]

Surely we could be more creative than that, Rat.

The fact that principle dictates we see no exceptions to freedom of speech, when we find so many exceptions in other situations, strictly as a matter of convenience?

Freedom of speech should not be sacrosanct; after all, one is legally precluded from shouting "FIRE!" in the proverbial crowded theater, yes?

Besides which, actual censorship can only be practiced by government anyway; any actions to refuse to foment expression (for example: the ClearChannel/Howard Stern case here in the U.S.) are simply a matter of choice, whether on a personal level, or, in the case of ClearChannel/Stern, a corporate one.

Many people fail to make the distinction:

We may not, as you would say, deprive anyone of their right to express themselves; we may, however, choose not to supply them with a megaphone or an audience*, as such augmentation is not a right.

EDIT:....*Or, in this case, internet access.

[Busyman]

I think this guy is most despicable and I'm glad he got the time but......

even though he is like a drug dealer, hooking kids when they're young, drug dealing is illegal.

Internet porn, however, is not.

[3RA1N1AC]

Originally posted by billyfridge@29 February 2004 - 04:23
I bet the con's will have a nice quiet 'word' with him

um... unless it's one of those minimum security "country club" prisons, a person has a fairly good chance of being beaten/raped/murdered/etc no matter what they've been convicted of. it's prison, after all.

[3RA1N1AC]

Originally posted by j2k4@1 March 2004 - 08:07
Those who champion freedom of speech at all costs, and preach taking the bad with the good are pronouncing a death sentence on any number of children.

as well as those who champion the right to bear arms, the right to pollute the environment, the right to invade other countries based on bad intel, the right to drink or smoke while pregnant, the right to own the myriad breeds of fighting dogs as pets, the right to run with scissors, and so forth and so forth. there are lots of things that you could equate to being anti-children. mcdonald's sets children on the slow path to obesity and health problems related to it.

i'm fairly certain that nothing i ever say or write will ever directly cause a child to die. i'd be surprised, as well, if there were any cases in which (during the pre-internet days) a child getting hold of a copy of Playboy or even Hustler ever actually killed him/her. there'd prolly be a surgeon general's warning or sumfin, if there were. or at least a warning against the dangers of masturbation.

[j2k4]

Originally posted by 3RA1N1AC+2 March 2004 - 06:55--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (3RA1N1AC &#064; 2 March 2004 - 06:55)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteBegin-j2k4@1 March 2004 - 08:07
Those who champion freedom of speech at all costs, and preach taking the bad with the good are pronouncing a death sentence on any number of children.

as well as those who champion the right to bear arms, the right to pollute the environment, the right to invade other countries based on bad intel, the right to drink or smoke while pregnant, the right to own the myriad breeds of fighting dogs as pets, the right to run with scissors, and so forth and so forth. there are lots of things that you could equate to being anti-children. mcdonald&#39;s sets children on the slow path to obesity and health problems related to it.

i&#39;m fairly certain that nothing i ever say or write will ever directly cause a child to die. i&#39;d be surprised, as well, if there were any cases in which (during the pre-internet days) a child getting hold of a copy of Playboy or even Hustler ever actually killed him/her. there&#39;d prolly be a surgeon general&#39;s warning or sumfin, if there were. or at least a warning against the dangers of masturbation.[/b][/quote]
True enough, but do you even see what I mean, 3RA1N1AC?

This is the world we live in: Warning labels with tortured language, and the word "PRO-" followed by the word "CHOICE" instead of the word "ABORTION", so that those who practice it might feel less guilt about it.

Big Brother lives, in the guise of American liberalism and it&#39;s aversion to plain speech.

Those of you who take exception to my sentiment, however, may not choose me off on the subject of the moral correctness of abortion (or it&#39;s lack) as I have not addressed that in this post.