100% Protection

[h1]

Member and Pyra agree to submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the state of California. If any provision(s) of the BTS is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be contrary to law, then such provision(s) shall be construed, as nearly as possible, to reflect the intentions of the parties with the other provisions remaining in full force and effect.

OWNED!

[Storm]

Originally posted by haxor41789@5 March 2004 - 23:49
I doubt if anyone here besides me and a few other people have an appreciation for what hacking really is...

hahaha............ nun against hacking (as long as, when it's used 4 harmfull things, it isnt used 2 damage companies other than M$ or SCO ), it gives us great programs, free of charge, but its against the board rules

@ djweiser: 100% protection is never possible, no rubber or proxy will change that........ only abstinance

[Mr. Blunt]

Originally posted by Storm@6 March 2004 - 17:05
@ djweiser: 100% protection is never possible, no rubber or proxy will change that........ only abstinance

That's true.

[h1]

Originally posted by Storm@6 March 2004 - 20:05
hahaha............ nun against hacking (as long as, when it's used 4 harmfull things, it isnt used 2 damage companies other than M$ or SCO ), it gives us great programs, free of charge, but its against the board rules

With that post, you've gone down in my book as an idiot.

Blunt, Lamo's almost as little a prick as Mitnick.

[shn]

Lamo was very lame

Keep Lamo