Originally posted by SensualBarfing+6 March 2004 - 00:23--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (SensualBarfing @ 6 March 2004 - 00:23)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>Originally posted by samsamsamsam@6 March 2004 - 03:18
<!--QuoteBegin-hobbes@6 March 2004 - 00:16
I think his point is one well taken here, and it is a shame that you guys seem so focused on the superficial.
Trash the concept for a triviality.
Maybe if you looked deeper rather than internalising the point on a superficial level you would have alluded to mine differently...........you can accept input if you wish rather than just proof testing[/b][/quote]
Looks like you to could do with the finer point of a more projected internalism with a redefined yet more subtley, as yet to say, pre-psuedoism with an alluding?
Bookmarks