[/b][/quote]Originally posted by SensualBarfing+6 March 2004 - 00:23--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (SensualBarfing @ 6 March 2004 - 00:23)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>Originally posted by samsamsamsam@6 March 2004 - 03:18
<!--QuoteBegin-hobbes@6 March 2004 - 00:16
I think his point is one well taken here, and it is a shame that you guys seem so focused on the superficial.
Trash the concept for a triviality.
Maybe if you looked deeper rather than internalising the point on a superficial level you would have alluded to mine differently...........you can accept input if you wish rather than just proof testing
Looks like you to could do with the finer point of a more projected internalism with a redefined yet more subtley, as yet to say, pre-psuedoism with an alluding?
Bookmarks