People That Will Be Involved For Big Decissions

[DanB]

I think making another 'elite' member group would be wrong

What is wrong with listening to the public opinon by threads etc? Making an elite group of senior members is just going to put even more people's noses out of joint

[CornerPocket]

I concur with the 'leave well enough alone' side. Stay with what we got, and keep everyone informed/involved in what goes on with the board as much as possible, not just a selected few or group. Get input from all

[Marius24]

its just a dissision of splitting the mature from the imature...

[TRshady]

Dont sound how it would help .. just course more division between members and people who make the rules and decisions. ... but if it goes ahead .. consider me.

[BigBoo]

Originally posted by Marius24@25 March 2004 - 21:02
its just a dissision of splitting the mature from the imature...

where do you put the j'pols and the billy deans?

[thewizeard]

Jetje I don't think it's really necessary, as on the whole the team does a good job. Remember you can make some of the people happy some of the time...but not all of the people all of the time. (and besides it will probably take me, at the rate I am posting, at least another year to be eligible to become a senator...

[Adster]

Ill vote yes but it's got is advantages and disadvantages

[uschi999_3]

Originally posted by peerzyboy@25 March 2004 - 18:29
yeah i mean, subconsiously i have ideas on who those people are already, i know its wrong but i divid ppl into groups, uber spamers, mods, repectful etc etc. It wouldnt be to hard to takle a few guesses at the people im thinking about...

Totally agree with you, James.

That is an interesting thought - all dividing of people in different
groups may be like putting them in classes. That is sad.

[CoolMac]

though i am not a senior member and i doubt i would take part in this i completely agree that this board should have what is called a "wisemen's comitee"

[kAb]

Yeah, maybe our opinions would be considered then.