-
Forum Star
BT Rep: +2
Ok but you cannot run the 266MHz FSB of the mobile at 400MHz like the non mobile one.
-
-
03-27-2004, 12:18 AM
Software & Hardware -
#12
Poster
Originally posted by Virtualbody1234@26 March 2004 - 16:02
Ok but you cannot run the 266MHz FSB of the mobile at 400MHz like the non mobile one.
I don't know where you find your information, my friend. As it is a pain to correct you, I shall provide a data link:
the 2500XP mobile can do the same and better than the non mobile, even 400 MHz+ FSB, read this: linkage
First up are the Voltage tests. As we mentioned earlier the XP-M (indicated in green on the chart) starts at a Vcore of 1.45. When we apply the common overclock of 11x200 for 2.2 you can see we are able to run at 1.60 on the XP-M but need to run 1.70 to remain stable* on the XP. Next we ramp up to 2.4 gig at 12 x 200, now the spread widens and we need a Vcore 1.925 compared to 1.75 on the XP-M; the Mobile Barton is starting to show it's worth. The final test here in comparison ends at 2.5 gig because that is all I was willing to push the XP to. I'm sure you'll understand why when you see in order to get 2.5 gig (12.5 x 200) I had to really stretch out the Vcore to a scary 2.15 while still on air cooling. Notice the XP-M comes in nicely at 1.875, meaning there is still some head room and we'll get to that later when we push into areas where the XP dare not tread.
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks