Discussions Closed?

[Virtualbody1234]

No matter what I say it will get twisted to what you want to see.

You want the mods to reply in some sort of "proper" way when we are dealing with members who seem to take pleasure in playing games with the mods to see how far they can be pushed?

You have just posted some more suggestions (rules) as to the way mods are supposed to behave. We are to take that in stride while being called a bitch again?

No matter what I say it will get twisted to what you want to see.

[Cheese]

Originally posted by Virtualbody1234@5 April 2004 - 14:43
No matter what I say it will get twisted to what you want to see.

You want the mods to reply in some sort of "proper" way when we are dealing with members who seem to take pleasure in playing games with the mods to see how far they can be pushed?

You have just posted some more suggestions (rules) as to the way mods are supposed to behave. We are to take that in stride while being called a bitch again?

No matter what I say it will get twisted to what you want to see.

I'm not twisting anything just merely suggesting how some things can be done better, it's up to you whether you want to be perceived as a "good" mod or otherwise. As has always been the case.

As to being called a "bitch" (which has nothing to do with me), if you're going to insult someone with an arrogant one word response (which is how it seemed to more people than just myself) then you're going to take flak for it.

[Peerzy]

Originally posted by Virtualbody1234@5 April 2004 - 15:43
No matter what I say it will get twisted to what you want to see.

You want the mods to reply in some sort of "proper" way when we are dealing with members who seem to take pleasure in playing games with the mods to see how far they can be pushed?

You have just posted some more suggestions (rules) as to the way mods are supposed to behave. We are to take that in stride while being called a bitch again?

No matter what I say it will get twisted to what you want to see.

Im not twisting shit, iv noticed over the last few weeks you have taken pot shots at me, so if yo asked your admin,

What do you think about the following idea/rule i have thought up

No.

is the answer

its almost like a big go fuck urself.

so you ask why not?

...

no reply

now your starting to get pissed off right, then it happens again,

When cops catch kids with dope, they dont just take it away, they give them a warning they tell them why not t do it, they tell them how bad it is.

they don't just say

no

So you deleat th thread, i ask for a reason, i get none, i get no pm on why it was deleated and unless i would have brought it up here i still woouldnt have. whats the point in taking the kids joint away if he's just going to buy some more gear?

i can see that your stuck on the thought that im wrong and your right, and im the same but vica versa.

[Rat Faced]

No threads are deleted, they are moved to a Forum that members cant access.

You may say "There's no difference"...however there is.

We are all human.

We all make mistakes.

The forum rules tell you how to make complaints about MODs, inc removal of threads.

If the Team believe that a thread was incorrectly removed, it would be put back into the Forum it was taken from, which we could not do if it was deleted. This has happened a number of times, its not "theory".

In the above case, in my opinion, VB did exactly the right thing.

Opening up a thread that would result in the calling or "taking the piss" of someone that used to belong here, and cannot defend himself (hell, he couldnt defend himself when he was here ffs&#33 is just not "fair".

I have no objection to people "taking the piss" out of people that can defend themselves, however I feel that IN was bullied somewhat while he was here... why the hell should that continue now?

There is no reason to PM people when we move threads, only for warnings etc. If we did have to, we would have no time to enjoy the forum ourselves, and we are also members. Luckily most posts we move are "double posts" etc. not due to trouble.

If a thread was going to be moved from the start, the poster usually has a good idea of that before he even posts. After all the hassle with BD last week, it is pretty obvious that any posts along the same lines would be moved either to the trash or into here.

[DanB]

I think you got called a bitch for the short curt reply but I could be mistaken

[Cheese]

What's wrong with merely closing a thread with a simple, "Stop this" message?

[Afronaut]

Well, maybe that "NO" answer was a bit short.
But i wouldn't go so far as callin Vb a "bitch".
That is just plain rude.
Did you get a PM (4 March) form Vb about your oversized sig/ava?
Did he (Vb) also made a smaller pic for you (and send via PM) to use if you so choose?
Is that the "pot shot" you referring to?
If not, i'd like to see where he does these shots.
Accusing him for doing it dont hold water for me before you provide some links
where this is taking place.

You could have talked to me over SS as you know im there pretty much.
You could have also send a PM to me, or other mod if you have questions regarding the
moved topics. If you feel that the Mods Sux0rs, you could PM an Admin about it.
It says so in the rules. You can not expect a PM back in 5 min as sometimes it takes time
to consider and talking in the Team Chat before anything happens.

But I guess it serves better for your "campain" to have this in public.

About your threads:

Apparently you are on your "campain" to free IENews form his Ban.

In your first thread you stated: "Free Internet.news for the good of a good laugh"

In your first second you asked ppl to bring pictures of David
(probably because it is impossible to find them in the board)
so you could add them for your Signature.

It seems you want to have a laugh on Davids expence.
And you want him back here so we could laugh some more.

Making a thread of David, whatever they would be, and laugh at him
is something i consider cheap.
Its like kicking the guy whos lying on the ground, defendless.

That is the core reason why I agree that your topics should have been moved to trash.
I just wasn't fast enough and some other mod moved them.

The second reason i can think of why not have threads about David is they get to
be flamed real bad. You get flamed, David gets flamed (see the point about lying man) and in the end its all tears.

If you really care about David (IENews) so much and you cant find him on your own,
PM me here or in SS and i can give you a link where you can talk with him or whatever you may wish. I am not against that at all.
But if you think you can make him a laughin-stock in here, especially now when he is banned,
It Is Not Going To Happen.

[Peerzy]

Originally posted by Guitar-Slinger@5 April 2004 - 17:45
Well, maybe that "NO" answer was a bit short.
But i wouldn't go so far as callin Vb a "bitch".
That is just plain rude.
Did you get a PM (4 March) form Vb about your oversized sig/ava?
Did he (Vb) also made a smaller pic for you (and send via PM) to use if you so choose?
Is that the "pot shot" you referring to?
If not, i'd like to see where he does these shots.
Accusing him for doing it dont hold water for me before you provide some links
where this is taking place.

You could have talked to me over SS as you know im there pretty much.
You could have also send a PM to me, or other mod if you have questions regarding the
moved topics. If you feel that the Mods Sux0rs, you could PM an Admin about it.
It says so in the rules. You can not expect a PM back in 5 min as sometimes it takes time
to consider and talking in the Team Chat before anything happens.

But I guess it serves better for your "campain" to have this in public.

About your threads:

Apparently you are on your "campain" to free IENews form his Ban.

In your first thread you stated: "Free Internet.news for the good of a good laugh"

In your first second you asked ppl to bring pictures of David
(probably because it is impossible to find them in the board)
so you could add them for your Signature.

It seems you want to have a laugh on Davids expence.
And you want him back here so we could laugh some more.

Making a thread of David, whatever they would be, and laugh at him
is something i consider cheap.
Its like kicking the guy whos lying on the ground, defendless.

That is the core reason why I agree that your topics should have been moved to trash.
I just wasn't fast enough and some other mod moved them.

The second reason i can think of why not have threads about David is they get to
be flamed real bad. You get flamed, David gets flamed (see the point about lying man) and in the end its all tears.

If you really care about David (IENews) so much and you cant find him on your own,
PM me here or in SS and i can give you a link where you can talk with him or whatever you may wish. I am not against that at all.
But if you think you can make him a laughin-stock in here, especially now when he is banned,
It Is Not Going To Happen.

Okay now that GS explained it a little more i see i was a bit out of order, truth be told i can't remember much of the hread because i was drunk, i can't remeber saying 'bring back I.N for the good of a good laugh.

No that was not a pot shot i was refering to, i was very pleased that Vb did that for me, although i have noticed im sure of it him having goes at me, i will try and find the links for them.

I know david outside of this board, im an admin on his board and i have him on msn, i was not trying to attack him in anyway or make people laugh at him, i was simply board and wanted to paint shop pro a few more sigs of mine. Admitably i spose that was wrong, and in a way it was taking the piss abit.

The way VB1234 reply in here, it seemed as if it had been a one man descision, that he choose the deleat the thread. I was in no way, taking personal attacts as Vb1234, he had just really annoyed me with that one word IMO stupid answer, i proberly shouldn't have called him bitch also. I was just annoyed. if i had known it had been in team chat, i wouldn't have acted like i did. Its just the way Vb replied and the way he talked in my eyes implied he closed the thread, it was his idea and no one else even knew about it.

I wasn't trying to make him a laughing stock or anything, it just seemed like an idea for me to pratice Paint shopping and was an idea. Althoug i still think i should have been informed in some way or another to why it was closed or the fact that it was closed.

Sorry

[Afronaut]

@ peerzyboy

We had a long chat in SS, so i can post this now:
These things happens sometimes,
sometimes a bit too easy also,
with a little bit more "laid back" attitude
and PMing im sure this little incident would not happen at all.

Im glad things are more clear now and it didnt
go to next level, flaming or what have we.



Hooray for communications !

[Busyman]

I think IN was a laughing stock and he made it that way.

We talk about hypo and Killa Sin the same way. Why not IN?