are you asking me or VB, or both?Originally posted by adamp2p@31 March 2004 - 22:33
Yes, that's true, but when gaming or processor intensive tasks, yes? Are you gaming?
if me, then yes, I am gaming...
are you asking me or VB, or both?Originally posted by adamp2p@31 March 2004 - 22:33
Yes, that's true, but when gaming or processor intensive tasks, yes? Are you gaming?
if me, then yes, I am gaming...
Q6600 @ 3.42Ghz | Gigabyte EP35-DS3R | EVGA 8800GT 721/1802/2006 w/ Accelero S1 | 4gb Crucial DDR2 @ 760mhz | 750gb Hitachi 7k1000 | Corsair 520HX | 2 x Samsung SyncMaster T240 24" | Windows 7 Ultimate
are you asking me or VB, or both?Originally posted by kaiweiler+31 March 2004 - 18:35--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (kaiweiler @ 31 March 2004 - 18:35)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-adamp2p@31 March 2004 - 22:33
Yes, that's true, but when gaming or processor intensive tasks, yes? Are you gaming?
if me, then yes, I am gaming... [/b][/quote]
Both, of course.
don't up vcore. my cpu's at 3.2, and my vcore is still default (1.6v). lower ur fsb ratio, and up ur vdimm. that's what i did
Yes, adamp2p, I am gaming.
I have also been running folding@home 24/7 for almost 3 weeks solid.
Yes, but you have an Intel CPU. Not the same animal.Originally posted by abu_has_the_power@31 March 2004 - 20:43
don't up vcore. my cpu's at 3.2, and my vcore is still default (1.6v). lower ur fsb ratio, and up ur vdimm. that's what i did
I had to up the Vcore a bit with my 2500 to get it up to 2.3
[SIZE=1]AMD 4200 X2 @ 2.65Ghz, ASRock 939-VSTA
1.75GB PC3200, 2 X 160GB Seagate w/ 8MB Buffer
HIS Radeon X800 Pro, Antec Super Lanboy Aluminum
ok. but have u even tried lower ratio and uping vdimm?
Lets see now according to my bios the next step of core voltage is 1.75 would this get to 2.2ghz?
I'm gaming,
Is there anyway to make the cpu fan go to max speed all the time? With or without Q-fan the cpu fan just keeps going up and down up and down I want it to go 3409rpm full time
Ohh noo!!! I make dribbles!!!
How come your next step is 1.75v? Default for that processor is 1.65v so the next step should be 1.675v. If it is already at 1.725v this could explain why your temps are high.Originally posted by Keikan@1 April 2004 - 05:56
Lets see now according to my bios the next step of core voltage is 1.75 would this get to 2.2ghz?
I run mine with Vcore set at 1.75v (according to the mobo setting, 1.76v according to Asusprobe) in order to achieve stability. Currently running with temps of 47C/25C (100%usage) with the cover off. My water cooling has arrived so hopefully much lower temps and less noise soon.
Abu - we are overclocking cpu chips here, not memory. How can increasing Vdimm have any effect whatsoever? Vdimm increases are for overclocked memory. And it seems pointless to increase processor performance then throw all the work away by running memory asynchronously.
.Political correctness is based on the principle that it's possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.
I think i'll just settle in here at 2.1ghz
Ohh noo!!! I make dribbles!!!
Bookmarks