Page 14 of 20 FirstFirst ... 411121314151617 ... LastLast
Results 131 to 140 of 199

Thread: Just Got Broken Into...

  1. #131
    The accuracy of the details of this case are absolutely irrelevant.

    The case centers around a young man whose sense of security has been flipped upside down. What he thought was secure is now vulnerable.

    Whether the fight occured or not. Whether he "kicked ass" or not, certainly has nothing to do with my response on this thread.

    The emotion he expresses is real and severe. He chose to portray himself as his own savior and that may be true or not, and also irrelevant.

    The young man did not post this to be a dickhead, but to vent an exteme emotion brought on by a novel and wholly unpleasant experience.

    I have responded to this thread in an attempt to say, "I understand your sense of violation and the resultant feeling of impotent rage" and not to indicate that I believe the story as fact nor support violence.

    When we sense that we have lost autonomy or have never had it, we do desperate things. We can make up stories about how we evened the score, or we can create a God which will make everything be alright in the end.

    The same emotion that drove the original rant is the same emotion that drove the creation of God, loss/lack of control and fear.

    Humans are real fairly simple entities.
    Aren't we in the trust tree, thingey?

  2. Lounge   -   #132
    was from the start, that the story is bunkum.


    i live hella close 20min drive to surry mabey i should go see if this "story is real" or if buddy is even 300pnds or whatever

  3. Lounge   -   #133
    Poster
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    9,781
    Originally posted by hobbes@11 April 2004 - 01:16
    The accuracy of the details of this case are absolutely irrelevant.

    The case centers around a young man whose sense of security has been flipped upside down. What he thought was secure is now vulnerable.

    Whether the fight occured or not. Whether he "kicked ass" or not, certainly has nothing to do with my response on this thread.

    The emotion he expresses is real and severe. He chose to portray himself as his own savior and that may be true or not, and also irrelevant.

    The young man did not post this to be a dickhead, but to vent an exteme emotion brought on by a novel and wholly unpleasant experience.

    I have responded to this thread in an attempt to say, "I understand your sense of violation and the resultant feeling of impotent rage" and not to indicate that I believe the story as fact nor support violence.

    When we sense that we have lost autonomy or have never had it, we do desperate things. We can make up stories about how we evened the score, or we can create a God which will make everything be alright in the end.

    The same emotion that drove the original rant is the same emotion that drove the creation of God, loss/lack of control and fear.

    Humans are real fairly simple entities.
    The only relevant thing in this whole thread is your support of mindless violence.

    You really should know better, but I did say that before.

  4. Lounge   -   #134
    i still say he's a midget with a complex

  5. Lounge   -   #135
    Originally posted by J'Pol@11 April 2004 - 01:51

    The only relevant thing in this whole thread is your support of mindless violence.

    You really should know better, but I did say that before.
    Other than the fact that I specifically stated that he did not make the right decision, but I understood his reaction, you are as wrong as possible.

    I supported him because I did not think he was a "dickhead" but a scared teenager.

    Humans are as simple in their motivations and reactions as I have stated. Do you have any evidence to the contrary?

    BTW, "mindless violence" would indicate that there was no reason for him to be upset at these particular individuals.

    Why are you quibbling details, they are beside the point?
    Aren't we in the trust tree, thingey?

  6. Lounge   -   #136
    Poster
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    9,781
    Originally posted by hobbes+11 April 2004 - 02:00--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (hobbes @ 11 April 2004 - 02:00)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-J&#39;Pol@11 April 2004 - 01:51

    The only relevant thing in this whole thread is your support of mindless violence.

    You really should know better, but I did say that before.
    Other than the fact that I specifically stated that he did not make the right decision, but I understood his reaction, you are as wrong as possible.

    I supported him because I did not think he was a "dickhead" but a scared teenager.

    Humans are as simple in their motivations and reactions as I have stated. Do you have any evidence to the contrary?

    BTW, "mindless violence" would indicate that there was no reason for him to be upset at these particular individuals.

    Why are you quibbling details, they are beside the point? [/b][/quote]
    This is an academic exercise to you. However some people take your comments seriously.

    You have provided justification for extreme violence. If that was your intention, then it was achieved.

    Congratulations.

  7. Lounge   -   #137
    Originally posted by hobbes@11 April 2004 - 01:16
    I have responded to this thread in an attempt to say, "I understand your sense of violation and the resultant feeling of impotent rage" and not to indicate that I believe the story as fact nor support violence.

    Yes, and this line would actually contradict you.

    Let us deal with what the thread was about: anxiety, fear, and loss of control, not a Scotland Yard scrutiny of the details.
    Aren't we in the trust tree, thingey?

  8. Lounge   -   #138
    Poster
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    9,781
    Originally posted by hobbes+11 April 2004 - 02:16--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (hobbes @ 11 April 2004 - 02:16)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-hobbes@11 April 2004 - 01:16
    I have responded to this thread in an attempt to say, "I understand your sense of violation and the resultant feeling of impotent rage" and not to indicate that I believe the story as fact nor support violence.

    Yes, and this line would actually contradict you.

    Let us deal with what the thread was about: anxiety, fear, and loss of control, not a Scotland Yard scrutiny of the details. [/b][/quote]
    Good point, never let the facts get in the way of your interpretation.

    The thread was about an alleged actual incident. Whether that suits you or not.

  9. Lounge   -   #139
    No, the thread was about a young mans emotional response to an experience which undermined his sense of security.

    Concepts >>> details
    Aren't we in the trust tree, thingey?

  10. Lounge   -   #140
    Poster
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    9,781
    Originally posted by hobbes@11 April 2004 - 02:42
    No, the thread was about a young mans emotional response to an experience which undermined his sense of security.

    Concepts >>> details
    No, the thread was started on the basis of a tissue of lies which you have chosen to dignify with your own interpretation.

    Purely because you were naive enough to believe those lies and arrogant enough not to bother reading what other people posted.

Page 14 of 20 FirstFirst ... 411121314151617 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •