Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 25 of 25

Thread: Looks Like Nv40 Aint All That Impressive!

  1. #21
    Lick My Lovepump
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Age
    22
    Posts
    2,657
    I hate the way they've put them charts. A bar chart of averages would be much better to look at.

  2. Software & Hardware   -   #22
    RGX's Avatar Unstoppable
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    3,012
    Guys guys guys.....check out these, dont rely on one set of benchmarks


    http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/article/1708.5/








    Personally, I think thats pretty damn impressive that in some cases its 50% faster than the 9800XT. We all know how graphics intensive far cry is and look at the FPS scores, pretty damn good. Looks like they have upped their image quality also.

    (Warning 56kers, hi res picture)

    http://www.firingsquad.com/media/hirez.asp...a/images/33.png



    MORE impressive in game benchmarks


    http://www.firingsquad.com/hardware/nvidia...ltra/page10.asp

    Whilst its not a huge jump, the scores are still impressive, and considering it seems to run Far Cry at 1600x1200 with ease, I think it blows most current cards out of the water. Cant wait to see ATi's offering now.

  3. Software & Hardware   -   #23
    tesco's Avatar woowoo
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Canadia
    Posts
    21,664
    Originally posted by RGX@14 April 2004 - 07:25
    Guys guys guys.....check out these, dont rely on one set of benchmarks


    http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/article/1708.5/








    Personally, I think thats pretty damn impressive that in some cases its 50% faster than the 9800XT. We all know how graphics intensive far cry is and look at the FPS scores, pretty damn good. Looks like they have upped their image quality also.

    (Warning 56kers, hi res picture)

    http://www.firingsquad.com/media/hirez.asp...a/images/33.png



    MORE impressive in game benchmarks


    http://www.firingsquad.com/hardware/nvidia...ltra/page10.asp

    Whilst its not a huge jump, the scores are still impressive, and considering it seems to run Far Cry at 1600x1200 with ease, I think it blows most current cards out of the water. Cant wait to see ATi's offering now.
    those are pretty impressive benchmarks

  4. Software & Hardware   -   #24
    RGX's Avatar Unstoppable
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    3,012
    Oh and by the way, my prediction for Pixel Shader 3.0 taking a long time to be used? Wrong . Its already here, and rumours are that ATi doesnt support it.

    Games that are going to be updated to use or already use Pixel Shader 3.0:


    Lord of the Rings: Battle for middle Earth
    Far Cry
    Painkiller
    Grafan
    Driver 3
    Madden 2005
    Tigerwoods 2005
    Splinter Cell X
    Vampire Bloodlines
    Stalker

    If it turns out that the rumours are true and the X800 doesnt support it, I think ATi may be in a world of hurt.

  5. Software & Hardware   -   #25
    tesco's Avatar woowoo
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Canadia
    Posts
    21,664
    Originally posted by RGX@14 April 2004 - 09:54
    Oh and by the way, my prediction for Pixel Shader 3.0 taking a long time to be used? Wrong . Its already here, and rumours are that ATi doesnt support it.

    Games that are going to be updated to use or already use Pixel Shader 3.0:


    Lord of the Rings: Battle for middle Earth
    Far Cry
    Painkiller
    Grafan
    Driver 3
    Madden 2005
    Tigerwoods 2005
    Splinter Cell X
    Vampire Bloodlines
    Stalker

    If it turns out that the rumours are true and the X800 doesnt support it, I think ATi may be in a world of hurt.
    driver 3! yay, use to love that game, but got bored of those crap ps1 graphics lol. id get it for ps2, or compuer if i get a better graphics card...

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •