Which Is Better, High Bandwidth Or Low Bandwidth?

psycoduck377 · 03-13-2003, 11:52 PM

please tell me!

**poli** · 03-13-2003, 11:57 PM

high

**Shinigami_[R.I.P.]** · 03-14-2003, 12:03 AM

Take what you can get. High though.

**DataMore** · 03-14-2003, 12:04 AM

Up, up and awaaaaaaaay!

High, like a crack head junkie!

**kAb** · 03-14-2003, 03:21 AM

bandwith is good..

n : a data transmission rate; the maximum amount of information (bits/second) that can be transmitted along a channel

so you want a lot of it

**neevakee** · 03-14-2003, 03:31 AM

I would die if i had to go back to 56k. Broadband is like a drug once you use it for a while you will never want to be without it. If you have the money it is well spent. Think about the savings with movies, software and games

**lunatacs** · 03-14-2003, 03:56 AM

oh man, don't tell me you like it hanging down all the time

has to be up, up and up, ready for more action

bwt high damnit

**Torpid_X** · 03-14-2003, 04:31 AM

Now this is the stupidest of stupid questions I've ever seen.

High speed = faster downloads = more goodies
Low speed = slower downloads = less goodies

High speed = always connectected = online always = open app (IE, Kazaa, etc) connected.
Low speed = dial up every time = telephone tied up = possible disconects if your lucky enough to get a connection. some dial up ISP's can't handle all of their customers online at the same time.

have you ever known slow to be better than fast? (except maybe old people driving)

not flaming you, but please!!!
Torp