I have misjudged you completely. I was under the impression you had a genuine reason to object as much as you do, but it turns out you're just spamming.Originally posted by NotoriousBIC+10 May 2004 - 16:05--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (NotoriousBIC @ 10 May 2004 - 16:05)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Withcheese@10 May 2004 - 15:11
To be honest you've lost me completely and its becoming more obvious that you have taken an objection to me the poster rather than the argument I present.
My ironic phrasing? My vehement stance? My 'innocent victim stance'? My questionable motives?
I think you are reading way too much into my posts, after all I am just a simple spammer on this forum who's second home is in Movieworld talking movies of a wide range.
Is it just that I disagree with you that you see these qualitities in me? Is it, perhaps, you yourself that have taken things too personally here, after all I am just talking about a proposed sub-section and have made my views more than clear (which I am apt to do and, more importantly, free to do). Perhaps it was my crack at Fastracker earlier that got your "wind up", in which case I apologize.
Though in future if I feel the need to contribute to a thread I will try to keep my posts to a maximum of 4 or 5 posts so as to be sure to be 'polite' to others. <---Is this the ironic phrasing?
[/b][/quote]
I think, perhaps, the true reason my lie in some sort of middle-ground. In part because I was against it, and in part because I like the sound of my own voice.
btw which thread are you referring to in the lounge...?
Bookmarks