cheaper than nowOriginally posted by Dray_04@5 May 2004 - 20:05
Is someone going to answer my question
how much will the R9800XT be?!![]()
cheaper than nowOriginally posted by Dray_04@5 May 2004 - 20:05
Is someone going to answer my question
how much will the R9800XT be?!![]()
1. Pixel Shader 3, as far as I have seen from screenshots, is hardly any different to Pixel Shader 2.0.Originally posted by atiVidia@6 May 2004 - 00:33
ok listen up:
when dx9.0c comes out and allows ps3, and games start to support 32bit floats, ATI will fall onto its knees
ati fanboy![]()
2. When games start to support 32 bit floats, ATi will have brought out a new card to support them. Until that day, ATi destroys nVIDIA in the benchmarks, AGAIN.
Go out and buy your precious 6800 if you like, your welcome to but you'll always know that there is a card out there at a similar price that has better image quality and framerates. I really hope that PS 3.0 is worth it, because as far as I can see, ATi flat out won this round. The image quality of the 6800 compared to the ATi is horrible....I dont care how fast my games running if it looks like that.
1. Pixel Shader 3, as far as I have seen from screenshots, is hardly any different to Pixel Shader 2.0.Originally posted by RGX+5 May 2004 - 17:08--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (RGX @ 5 May 2004 - 17:08)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-atiVidia@6 May 2004 - 00:33
ok listen up:
when dx9.0c comes out and allows ps3, and games start to support 32bit floats, ATI will fall onto its knees
ati fanboy![]()
2. When games start to support 32 bit floats, ATi will have brought out a new card to support them. Until that day, ATi destroys nVIDIA in the benchmarks, AGAIN.
Go out and buy your precious 6800 if you like, your welcome to but you'll always know that there is a card out there at a similar price that has better image quality and framerates. I really hope that PS 3.0 is worth it, because as far as I can see, ATi flat out won this round. The image quality of the 6800 compared to the ATi is horrible....I dont care how fast my games running if it looks like that. [/b][/quote]
RGX, you are UNSTOPPABLE! Lay it down.
This whole fanboi thing really gets me! I mean, do you REALLY think that if NVIDIA was WINNING in EVERY gaming benchmark (as ATI is right now), I would not be concluding that NVIDIA is the leader? Nonsense. I agree with the journalists especially when they ALL are saying the same thing!!!
![]()
1. Pixel Shader 3, as far as I have seen from screenshots, is hardly any different to Pixel Shader 2.0.Originally posted by RGX+5 May 2004 - 17:08--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (RGX @ 5 May 2004 - 17:08)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-atiVidia@6 May 2004 - 00:33
ok listen up:
when dx9.0c comes out and allows ps3, and games start to support 32bit floats, ATI will fall onto its knees
ati fanboy![]()
2. When games start to support 32 bit floats, ATi will have brought out a new card to support them. Until that day, ATi destroys nVIDIA in the benchmarks, AGAIN.
Go out and buy your precious 6800 if you like, your welcome to but you'll always know that there is a card out there at a similar price that has better image quality and framerates. I really hope that PS 3.0 is worth it, because as far as I can see, ATi flat out won this round. The image quality of the 6800 compared to the ATi is horrible....I dont care how fast my games running if it looks like that. [/b][/quote]
And you are going to need a new power supply too, so add that to the bill as well!
Originally posted by Dray_04@5 May 2004 - 21:07
wow thanks rossco...![]()
![]()
![]()
im running along with the lh beta crew (finally)
9.0c should be out by the summer, with Pixelshader 3.
games using PS3 will show up before q4 ends. this includes (possibly) half life 2.
adam, please dont quad post, and please dont spit BS into our faces.
Originally posted by ROSSCO_2004+6 May 2004 - 14:15--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (ROSSCO_2004 @ 6 May 2004 - 14:15)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Dray_04@5 May 2004 - 21:07
wow thanks rossco...![]()
![]()
[/b][/quote]
:box:
:box: [/b][/quote]Originally posted by Dray_04+5 May 2004 - 21:20--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Dray_04 @ 5 May 2004 - 21:20)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>Originally posted by ROSSCO_2004@6 May 2004 - 14:15
<!--QuoteBegin-Dray_04@5 May 2004 - 21:07
wow thanks rossco...![]()
![]()
![]()
oh yeah!
im magical
HA! lol.
wanna take this outside?do you? huh? huh? do you? huh? huh? come on! lets go! ill kick your ass.
![]()
![]()
atividia v. rossco
:box:
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Why did I reach this page instead to see my posted message ?
Possible Reasons:
* You already posted your message (double post)
* You are using a script to post messages
* You hit the reload button but your message was already posted
If you think this is an error please contact our administrators and they will look into this problem. Please make sure to check the forum you posted to see if your message is not already there.
The Administration
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Bookmarks