Hey adam,did you ever fell like you are
![]()
I think you are on this one.Nvidia fans will never admit defeat.
Hey adam,did you ever fell like you are
![]()
I think you are on this one.Nvidia fans will never admit defeat.
Gigabyte GA7-VT600 P-L
Athlon XP2500+ @ 3200+
512mb OCZ DDR333 (2,3,3,7)
Samsung SP8004h 80gig harddrive
Radeon 9200 128 mb
LG cdrw/dvd drive
![]()
![]()
I think it's hilarious!
but then again i hate horses more then anything...
Q6600 @ 3.42Ghz | Gigabyte EP35-DS3R | EVGA 8800GT 721/1802/2006 w/ Accelero S1 | 4gb Crucial DDR2 @ 760mhz | 750gb Hitachi 7k1000 | Corsair 520HX | 2 x Samsung SyncMaster T240 24" | Windows 7 Ultimate
Why can't the X800 play UT2004 at 2048x1536?
nvidia drivers can force games to play at resolutions higher than they can otherwise. ut2004 has a limit of 1600x1200. nvidia can force it to 2048x1536 whereas ati cant.
Thats no argument. I bet any number of registry hacks/fixes can do the same, nevermind game tweaks.Originally posted by atiVidia@6 May 2004 - 20:23
nvidia drivers can force games to play at resolutions higher than they can otherwise. ut2004 has a limit of 1600x1200. nvidia can force it to 2048x1536 whereas ati cant.
will it be at a decent fps?
id like to see that.
@rgx: if i was trying to reason with you, this thread would not have hit 6 pages. stop trollingif its a waste of your time, then WHY ARE YOU DOING IT???
:teehee:
Must just be us crazy Nova Scotians I guess because I find it funny as hell also.Originally posted by kaiweiler@6 May 2004 - 21:20
![]()
![]()
I think it's hilarious!
but then again i hate horses more then anything...![]()
Gigabyte GA7-VT600 P-L
Athlon XP2500+ @ 3200+
512mb OCZ DDR333 (2,3,3,7)
Samsung SP8004h 80gig harddrive
Radeon 9200 128 mb
LG cdrw/dvd drive
I had stopped. It was a waste of my time because you were an idiot. I am not trolling, I am stating my opinion. You are stating yours, and although in practice it is wrong, you are welcome to it. I also have the right to argue with that opinion however. This argument was and still is a wast of my time, but a direct reply requires a direct response.Originally posted by atiVidia@6 May 2004 - 21:21
will it be at a decent fps?
id like to see that.
@rgx: if i was trying to reason with you, this thread would not have hit 6 pages. stop trollingif its a waste of your time, then WHY ARE YOU DOING IT???
:teehee:
I had stopped. It was a waste of my time because you were an idiot. I am not trolling, I am stating my opinion. You are stating yours, and although in practice it is wrong, you are welcome to it. I also have the right to argue with that opinion however. This argument was and still is a wast of my time, but a direct reply requires a direct response. [/b][/quote]Originally posted by RGX+6 May 2004 - 16:42--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (RGX @ 6 May 2004 - 16:42)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-atiVidia@6 May 2004 - 21:21
will it be at a decent fps?
id like to see that.
@rgx: if i was trying to reason with you, this thread would not have hit 6 pages. stop trollingif its a waste of your time, then WHY ARE YOU DOING IT???
:teehee:
i coulda sworn u were trolling.
also the 6800gt (when OCd, can beat an x800xt OCed) takes less power than many other cards.
so ur argument is false.
i wont be surprised if someone ends up asking to close this thread or move it to the lounge![]()
Bookmarks