E3 Games Lists

[BigBoo]

Originally posted by dinner123+10 May 2004 - 19:43--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (dinner123 &#064; 10 May 2004 - 19:43)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>

Originally posted by BigBoo@9 May 2004 - 17:20

Originally posted by dinner123@9 May 2004 - 16:21
<!--QuoteBegin-BigBoo

@9 May 2004 - 16:03
the BF series are my longterm favourite games but i can never get excited about an EA list... more money than heart -_-

EA have cleaned up their act recently and arent just churning out crap game licences anymore. Fifa,Lord of the Rings:Return of the King and Need for Speed Underground are just a few examples of good games that EA have made in the past year.
Your stereotype is wearing thin...

fifa&#33;? nth sequal with a weak engine that will never live up to the ISS series. but is more popular because of name and marketing

LOTR&#33;? another film cashin looks impressive, plays impressive for 5 minutes. quicky becomes tedious

NFS:underground&#33; old series, old name, old engine. these were good at first on ps1. but are outclassed by so many now. graphcal "the fast and the furious" image rip-off/revamp couldnt save it for me


stereotype alive and kicking

I think you mean Pro Evo series. ISS is completelty different
It is not more popular becasue of marketing,it is more accesible to the &#39;causal gamer&#39; who just wants to pick up and play. And there are more &#39;casual gamers&#39; out there, than &#39;proper&#39; gamers who want to have all the features of Pro Evo.

What game have been playing? It does not quickly become tedious. There is a wide enough range of elements and characters to give enough variety. Dont judge the game purely on your biased opinion of EA.

Who cares about graphics if it plays well? And what about &#39;Old series&#39; &#39;Old name&#39;, Zelda,Mario,Sonic are old series/games, are you saying they are crap as well.
[/b][/quote]
fair point but the game engine still isnt the best, and theres no way near enough progression or variety for it to be released as a new game each year

tap tap tap tap tap tap tap.
bill: wanna do something more fun like watch paint dry
tap tap tap tap tap tap tap.
ben: hold on i wanna get merry
tap tap tap tap tap tap tap.
bill: he sucks, hes the same as the rest
tap tap tap tap tap tap tap.
ben: fairpoint
click&#33;

its rubbish. the tracks are the worst ever on a need for speed game, you never have to let go of R. The fact that the drift game and normal race use different engines is a clear sign that it isnt very good to me

edit i was reading the mini reviews in NOM a bit back and has anyone noticed that most games are £39.99 and EA ones are £44.99

[dinner123]

Originally posted by BigBoo@10 May 2004 - 20:09
fair point but the game engine still isnt the best, and theres no way near enough progression or variety for it to be released as a new game each year

tap tap tap tap tap tap tap.
bill: wanna do something more fun like watch paint dry
tap tap tap tap tap tap tap.
ben: hold on i wanna get merry
tap tap tap tap tap tap tap.
bill: he sucks, hes the same as the rest
tap tap tap tap tap tap tap.
ben: fairpoint
click&#33;

its rubbish. the tracks are the worst ever on a need for speed game, you never have to let go of R. The fact that the drift game and normal race use different engines is a clear sign that it isnt very good to me

edit i was reading the mini reviews in NOM a bit back and has anyone noticed that most games are £39.99 and EA ones are £44.99

Yeah,i agree with that.Its good for quick fix though.

I actually thought it was a good game.But hey,if you dont like,then you dont.

Well it was good when it came. TOCA 2 is better,so is PGR2 but i dont have an Xbox so i dont know what it plays like.

£44.99 for a game,i would never pay that much. On Amazon most games usually cost £29.99