Lord Of The Rings 1-3

[gungrave]

id have to say 2 i liked the battle for helmsdeep

[SillyRumours]

i didn't like the action-less scenes, far too slow paced - all of them could have done with about an hour less of film, especially ROTK with the damn epilogue, and a bit less homoerotism - but if i blank out all the bad bits they're good films

[abu_has_the_power]

r u kidding? lotr is a one of the best trilogies, aside from star wars and back to the future and indiana jones

[Aaron_T]

poo

[foot loose]

lotr was wkd
lotr 2 was even better
lotr 3 was even better

can't wait for the hobbet to be filmed and releast in 2007????

[gungrave]

Originally posted by foot loose@9 May 2004 - 17:24
lotr was wkd
lotr 2 was even better
lotr 3 was even better

can't wait for the hobbet to be filmed and releast in 2007????

i aint waitin that long

[Xero Grid]

I really liked the trilogy.
It was a truly epic story and an even bigger task of making it into a movie, but very well done. Many of the die-hard fans of the books bitched about specifics and I can see their point, but some people fail to account for the fact that each was a movie you watch in one sitting, not something you curl up with for several days or more.

-- Xero Grid --

[Manny Roscoe]

True classics of our time.....

50 years from now, it'll still be discussed.

[2nd gen noob]

Originally posted by abu_has_the_power@9 May 2004 - 14:49
r u kidding? lotr is a one of the best trilogies, aside from star wars and back to the future and indiana jones

There's this little thing called an "opinion". You don't sound as though you've heard of it.

[destroyerofevil]

My frens, i dont noe bout u but im cryin over the good quality of this trilogy. In fact, i only appreciated the whole thing after i watched the third movie and rewatched all three on dvd but now...there gone!! :'(