ok or-whateverurnameis
u obviously havent been reading the latest benchies.
for intel: HT wont matter at all once 64 bit XP hits the market
@ ffuuggssddss: wait a little longer for the newer a64s
ok or-whateverurnameis
u obviously havent been reading the latest benchies.
for intel: HT wont matter at all once 64 bit XP hits the market
@ ffuuggssddss: wait a little longer for the newer a64s
Is that when they chop his head off? Thats fucking nasty..i hate terrorist..there so fucking dumbOriginally posted by SingaBoiy@12 May 2004 - 21:44
64-bit 3200+ is still better then any intel chip.
I just watched that nick berg video. If I was face to face with those mother fuckers... id kill them as slowly as posible.![]()
[SIZE=1]AMD 4200 X2 @ 2.65Ghz, ASRock 939-VSTA
1.75GB PC3200, 2 X 160GB Seagate w/ 8MB Buffer
HIS Radeon X800 Pro, Antec Super Lanboy Aluminum
Is that when they chop his head off? Thats fucking nasty..i hate terrorist..there so fucking dumb [/b][/quote]Originally posted by bigdawgfoxx+13 May 2004 - 12:37--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (bigdawgfoxx @ 13 May 2004 - 12:37)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-SingaBoiy@12 May 2004 - 21:44
64-bit 3200+ is still better then any intel chip.
I just watched that nick berg video. If I was face to face with those mother fuckers... id kill them as slowly as posible.![]()
One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter.
how much crack did you smoke before you wrote that? [/b][/quote]Originally posted by apunkrockmonk+13 May 2004 - 03:19--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (apunkrockmonk @ 13 May 2004 - 03:19)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-orcutt989@13 May 2004 - 02:13
Amd is cost effective, yet if you are a consumer that likes to listen to music, edit photos, upload websites, design websites, run a virus scan, play multiple games, look at multiple browswer windows, you will find yourself getting caught with an AMD not being able to run multiple programs even though it has a good clockspeed.
i think SB is just proof that commercials work![]()
I watched the video ohhh boy it was some nasty shiat.
Well it was revenge for the iraqies since of the embarassment of the prisoners.
P4 2.4C / 1024M / R9600XT 128M / 80GB / 400W
Peer-to-peer Programs...
Clearly you are an alien.Originally posted by orcutt989@12 May 2004 - 19:13
Amd is cost effective, yet if you are a consumer that likes to listen to music, edit photos, upload websites, design websites, run a virus scan, play multiple games, look at multiple browswer windows, you will find yourself getting caught with an AMD not being able to run multiple programs even though it has a good clockspeed.
Your race must be very advanced to multitask like that.
I look forward to evolving to your level.
Go with AMD...more bang for the buck.
Take the money you save and invest in good memory and a fast HDD.
Remember, it's not just the chip that makes for a fast, flexible machine.
"I am the one who knocks."- Heisenberg
what do u mean by newer amd's? Will there be a huge difference if i get one now then if i get one in 3 months?Originally posted by atiVidia@13 May 2004 - 04:40
ok or-whateverurnameis
u obviously havent been reading the latest benchies.
for intel: HT wont matter at all once 64 bit XP hits the market
@ ffuuggssddss: wait a little longer for the newer a64s
what do u mean by newer amd's? Will there be a huge difference if i get one now then if i get one in 3 months? [/b][/quote]Originally posted by ffuuggssddss+14 May 2004 - 18:02--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (ffuuggssddss @ 14 May 2004 - 18:02)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-atiVidia@13 May 2004 - 04:40
ok or-whateverurnameis
u obviously havent been reading the latest benchies.
for intel: HT wont matter at all once 64 bit XP hits the market
@ ffuuggssddss: wait a little longer for the newer a64s
the new ones will have a higher clock speed, and the old ones will have a lower price tag![]()
the new ones will have a higher clock speed, and the old ones will have a lower price tagOriginally posted by ROSSCO_2004+14 May 2004 - 23:03--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (ROSSCO_2004 @ 14 May 2004 - 23:03)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>Originally posted by ffuuggssddss@14 May 2004 - 18:02
<!--QuoteBegin-atiVidia@13 May 2004 - 04:40
ok or-whateverurnameis
u obviously havent been reading the latest benchies.
for intel: HT wont matter at all once 64 bit XP hits the market
@ ffuuggssddss: wait a little longer for the newer a64s
what do u mean by newer amd's? Will there be a huge difference if i get one now then if i get one in 3 months?[/b][/quote]
What i ment was, a noticeable difference in speed, im not really talking about the clockspeeds.... 3400+ -> 3800+ doesnt seem like a worthwhile difference. But yeah, prices drop =p
Bookmarks