╚════╩═╬════╝
Is it more important to be a
1.Post Starter
2.Post Replier
In the sense that
Anyone can start a post
and
Anyone can reply
...with crap
but what is the more important
to have
an interesting thoughtfull, humoristic etc Post Start?
or
the start dont make a difference as long as the Replies are interesting etc.
?
(all these questions have absolutly no relevance to this actual Post)
Reborn again
BT Rep: +3
the starter and replier are of equal importance
the repliers are reliant on the starter
and the starter would starting pointlessly if no-one replied
many other factors also feature
1. the title
2. the topic
3. who happens to be on the board
4. how long it remains on the front page
5. the mood of the day
6. spam - couldn't live without it
This fate is worse than death. Condemned to live out existence in a vessel incapable of sustaining my true glory. How am I to function with such limitation? - Illyria
Excellent question, good reply.
well saidOriginally posted by J'Pol@25 June 2004 - 14:24
Excellent question, good reply.
Spam
Reborn again
BT Rep: +3
couldn't live without it
This fate is worse than death. Condemned to live out existence in a vessel incapable of sustaining my true glory. How am I to function with such limitation? - Illyria
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks