Which would surpass in efficiency: three DIMMs, 1536MB of DDR SDRAM, operating in single-channel or two DIMMs, 1024MB of DDR SDRAM, operating in dual-channel?
Which would surpass in efficiency: three DIMMs, 1536MB of DDR SDRAM, operating in single-channel or two DIMMs, 1024MB of DDR SDRAM, operating in dual-channel?
I think it would depend entirely on the motherboard.
"I am the one who knocks."- Heisenberg
I heard that the dual channel benefits aren't as good as a good increase in ram, but I've got no empirical data of my own to back it up.
Clocker says Dual-Channel didn't give him much better performance, but then again who needs 1.5gb of ram.
I'd say go for more ram.
More ram is always a benefit. And depending on your motherboard you may be able to keep a gig running in dual channel and then a 512mb stick in single channel as well.
With the NF7-S, if I put 2x256mb sticks in slot 2 and 3 and then say a 512 stick in slot 1, the two 256 will run dual channel while the 512 will run single.
Q6600 @ 3.42Ghz | Gigabyte EP35-DS3R | EVGA 8800GT 721/1802/2006 w/ Accelero S1 | 4gb Crucial DDR2 @ 760mhz | 750gb Hitachi 7k1000 | Corsair 520HX | 2 x Samsung SyncMaster T240 24" | Windows 7 Ultimate
Cool. Any Socket 478 motherboards capable of that?
K,Originally posted by kaiweiler@5 July 2004 - 10:45
More ram is always a benefit. And depending on your motherboard you may be able to keep a gig running in dual channel and then a 512mb stick in single channel as well.
With the NF7-S, if I put 2x256mb sticks in slot 2 and 3 and then say a 512 stick in slot 1, the two 256 will run dual channel while the 512 will run single.
Have you actually run any benchmarks with the RAM installed in different slots?
I did and saw no difference whatsoever.
There seems to be disagreement as to which slots on the NF7-S are dual-channel enabled, so I tried three different arrangements ( 2&3, which is what the manual tells you to do, 1&2 and finally 1&3) with similar ( not identical, but close) benchmarks.
I wonder what the deal is?
"I am the one who knocks."- Heisenberg
Actually I emailed Abit about the issue you are speaking of, because I as well tried switching the ram around into various different arangements. The email I recieved stated the fact which I posted earlier. That if I were to put 2x256mb sticks in slot 2 and 3 and then a 512mb stick in slot 1, the two 256 will run dual channel while the 512 will run single channel by itself. Slots 2 and 3 are for running in Dual channel. As far as the Abit representative said anyway.
Q6600 @ 3.42Ghz | Gigabyte EP35-DS3R | EVGA 8800GT 721/1802/2006 w/ Accelero S1 | 4gb Crucial DDR2 @ 760mhz | 750gb Hitachi 7k1000 | Corsair 520HX | 2 x Samsung SyncMaster T240 24" | Windows 7 Ultimate
And?
Have you tested at all to see if that is correct?
"I am the one who knocks."- Heisenberg
As you said before there were marginal benchmark increases, almost enough to just say it was a fluke. Dual channel does not seem to affect much at all, if anythingOriginally posted by clocker@5 July 2004 - 17:57
And?
Have you tested at all to see if that is correct?
Q6600 @ 3.42Ghz | Gigabyte EP35-DS3R | EVGA 8800GT 721/1802/2006 w/ Accelero S1 | 4gb Crucial DDR2 @ 760mhz | 750gb Hitachi 7k1000 | Corsair 520HX | 2 x Samsung SyncMaster T240 24" | Windows 7 Ultimate
Bookmarks