Actually f*ck that!!!Originally posted by Busyman+12 July 2004 - 20:14--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Busyman @ 12 July 2004 - 20:14)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>Originally posted by Withcheese@12 July 2004 - 16:10
<!--QuoteBegin-Error403@12 July 2004 - 20:06
Samsamsamsam has been issued several warnings over time. In fact his warn level was so high (the highest of all active members) that formally a ban was long over due. We had a vote in team chat and the majority voted for a ban. The rest voted for indefinate moderation.
I expect you had the vote before you all saw the extent of the feelings of the board members.
Vote again, read through the threads and make a decision based on that. Seems only fair that way.
A member should not be allowed unbanning because of "friendship".
(whatever internet "friendship" is)![]()
If that be the case, bring back HillBilly Jean!!!
I think I heard this same mantra before for him. [/b][/quote]
Billy Dean was a useless twat and sam doesn't deserved to be mentioned in the same sentence as him.
They are completely different people and are being banned for different things. Billy Dean doesn't even have an excuse for his behaviour.
Bookmarks