Where's Samsamsamsam?

[Snee]

Originally posted by kAb@12 July 2004 - 22:18
celery
sharedholder
musleman
billy dean
rappy

Celery is the only one of those I'd compare to sam.



The others did their part to deserve it in a wholly other way..

a couple of them are in dr spaulding's, ooops I mean hypo's, league.

[kAb]

Originally posted by JONNO_CELEBS@12 July 2004 - 14:20
Rikk had many warnings and chose to ignor them
Rappy was REALLY annoying ALL of the time
Did'nt know MM had been banned, musta missed that
Cely went out in a blaze of glory
And SH if I remember right was being very bad

Jonno B)

from what i hear, rappy didn't post kiddie porn, there was just a young person on one of the links of the pages. + annoying shouldn't constitute a ban, as I find you as a cocky annoying person also Jonno, ban? no.

obviously you heard wrong, cause SH & MM never did anything bad against the board

[Snee]

Originally posted by kAb@12 July 2004 - 22:27
from what i hear, rappy didn't post kiddie porn, there was just a young person on one of the links of the pages. +

From what you heard you heard wrong.

Lovely links, is all I'm saying

[JONNO_CELEBS]

I find you as a cocky annoying person also Jonno

Well thankyou I profess to be nothing more than what I am, you like me, you dislike me, your choice
Never actually had anything against you I must admit Just thought your post was the wrong kind of response needed, it's like shouting at a copper will get you nicked.

As for those names, maybe you should ask a mod
I replied with what I know, may not be true, but thats what I know

Jonno B)

[Busyman]

You folks are in denial.

Forget the being bad crap for a moment.

Ignoring board rules and circumventing them after being warned gets you a kick in the nuts.

Stop comparing banned members.

They each did their own shit.

[JONNO_CELEBS]

Sam has not done "Nothing" wrong, he's done lots wrong, he'll tell you that himself.
The point is he's more good than bad.

You did'nt read that part then?

I think the point here is not that Sam has been banned acording to rules, but that it may be worth giving him a bit of a chance, a permenant ban is harsh for what he has done under the circumstances.

Jonno B)

[Cheese]

Originally posted by JONNO_CELEBS@12 July 2004 - 21:36

Sam has not done "Nothing" wrong, he's done lots wrong, he'll tell you that himself.
The point is he's more good than bad.

You did'nt read that part then?

I think the point here is not that Sam has been banned acording to rules, but that it may be worth giving him a bit of a chance, a permenant ban is harsh for what he has done under the circumstances.

Jonno B)

I reckon a hefty-suspension of his account would have been a good idea.

3 months suspended.

If in that time he posted under a different name: BAN

If he fucked up after the three months: BAN

Would have worked, could still...

[Busyman]

Originally posted by Withcheese+12 July 2004 - 17:40--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Withcheese @ 12 July 2004 - 17:40)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-JONNO_CELEBS@12 July 2004 - 21:36

Sam has not done "Nothing" wrong, he&#39;s done lots wrong, he&#39;ll tell you that himself.
The point is he&#39;s more good than bad.

You did&#39;nt read that part then?

I think the point here is not that Sam has been banned acording to rules, but that it may be worth giving him a bit of a chance, a permenant ban is harsh for what he has done under the circumstances.

Jonno B)

I reckon a hefty-suspension of his account would have been a good idea.

3 months suspended.

If in that time he posted under a different name: BAN

If he fucked up after the three months: BAN

Would have worked, could still... [/b][/quote]
I think he is already banned and so be it.

He already broke the rules so : BAN.

Moving on..............

[Cheese]

Originally posted by Busyman+12 July 2004 - 21:46--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Busyman @ 12 July 2004 - 21:46)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>

Originally posted by Withcheese@12 July 2004 - 17:40
<!--QuoteBegin-JONNO_CELEBS

@12 July 2004 - 21:36

Sam has not done "Nothing" wrong, he&#39;s done lots wrong, he&#39;ll tell you that himself.
The point is he&#39;s more good than bad.

You did&#39;nt read that part then?

I think the point here is not that Sam has been banned acording to rules, but that it may be worth giving him a bit of a chance, a permenant ban is harsh for what he has done under the circumstances.

Jonno B)

I reckon a hefty-suspension of his account would have been a good idea.

3 months suspended.

If in that time he posted under a different name: BAN

If he fucked up after the three months: BAN

Would have worked, could still...

I think he is already banned and so be it.

He already broke the rules so : BAN.

Moving on.............. [/b][/quote]
Yes, but do they actually need to be so heavy handed with the rules? Though you usually play devil&#39;s advocates in any of these types of discussions so...

Things are getting a little silly now...

Snny is on moderation, ginguar is on moderation and even poor old me. Are they going to mod the whole board?

[JONNO_CELEBS]

Originally posted by Withcheese@12 July 2004 - 22:03

Things are getting a little silly now...

Snny is on moderation, ginguar is on moderation and even poor old me. Are they going to mod the whole board?

Agreed, getting way out of hand

Hate to say it but I did predict/warn about this

This could be quite damaging to the community of the board, how far does it go?

Maybe if we or someone could actually have a conversation with the Admin who actually passed Sam&#39;s Ban?

A Conversation&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33; Not a fight but an adult conversation

Jonno B)