Then I must repeat myself, getting ridiculed from both sides = damned if we do, damned if we don't. There will always be some that agree and many that don't.
In my view it seems that members are almost always against actions that are taken vs agree (rarely does this happen), why is that, because they have no say as to what should be done? Why is it hard to accept what one gets because of their own action/fault.
You imply that mods should listen? What about members, should they not? Perhaps the concept of give a little, get a little would be a consideration. Listening should be done from both sides of the table, wouldn't you agree?
Bookmarks