Originally posted by pol+13 July 2004 - 12:37--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (pol @ 13 July 2004 - 12:37)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>Originally posted by manker@13 July 2004 - 12:35
<!--QuoteBegin-Error403@13 July 2004 - 12:22
The votes in order of time:
#1: CornerPocket
#2: [O][T]
#3: Error403
#4: {I}{K}{E}
#5: Virtualbody1234
#6: Rat Faced
#7: NikkiD
#8: Rip The Jacker
#9: Guitar-Slinger
#10: jetje
#11: pol
#12: RPerry
#13: MagicNakor
Now stfu.
I've already agreed my original post was in error regarding the forum star vote.
How about the part where some people say it is a desirable moderator/admin trait to seek, listen to and take into account member opinion on certain matters which breed discontent among the community as a whole. What are your feelings on that?
certain matters is fine. moderation/banning of members is not [/quote]
Are you Error too?![]()
I didn't realise that was the official policy, where does it say that in the board rules? More specifically I mean where exactly do the rules say that member opinion is not important when it comes to banning or moderation of a member but is important on anything else?
edit: typing
Bookmarks