I just recently added ram to my system and NIS2003 runs without any performance issues at all. If you don't have much ram, then don't use Norton.
I just recently added ram to my system and NIS2003 runs without any performance issues at all. If you don't have much ram, then don't use Norton.
Poster
BT Rep: +3
it doesnt run w/o performance issues, but if you dont have enough RAM, you shouldnt use it.........Originally posted by rr_kingozz@19 July 2004 - 03:19
NIS2003 runs without any performance issues at all. If you don't have much ram, then don't use Norton.
but what if you have enough RAM and dont want some program to demand it all?
Poster
Hmmm....Make it just plain old NAV 03. Sorry shn, it's been a while.
As for Chewie, I'm happy for you and your customers. I've had a few probs with Norton products in general and NAV in particular over the years. Norton is just to hoggish of resources and when it does decide to screw up, it does it in a grand manner.
As for uninstalls, products don't fully uninstall. And yes, that's what registry editors are for, but damnit, they should at least clean up after themselves well enough not to Bork the system afterwards!
As for the diff between AVG free and Pro, it appears that the only diff is that Pro gives more options such as scanning methods. A quick scan of their website wasn't very revealing, however. The main product, e.g. the AV itself, appears to be the same. Pro is more flexible, for example, but detects no better. I could be wrong. I would like to think this is the case and I saw nothing to indicate otherwise.
If I'm wrong, please correct me.
BoNe
Liberal: Lib er al Someone who's mind is so open their brains fell out.
Real cars don't make horsepower at the front wheels, they lift them.
Lead, follow or get yer ass run over!
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
but what if you have enough RAM and dont want some program to demand it all?
Bookmarks