This Is My Clone
BT Rep: +19
Oh and by the way...Im on my last warning yet i still speak my mind...being over-dramatic never gets you anywhere...you should of just chilled and went on your daily life like you never got the pm and just continued speaking your mind...but its a bit too late for that i spose...
His was the highest, every mod that saw it once would never forget it. no tools needed for thatOriginally posted by jetje+21 July 2004 - 11:48--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (jetje @ 21 July 2004 - 11:48)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-peerzyboy@21 July 2004 - 13:39
Error403 gave one reason as to why Samsamsamsam was banned was he had the highest warn level on the forum, is that even possible to check everybodys warn levelw ith a tool?
But he wasn't banned because he had such a high level! But when he came up for discussion it was taken into the debate... so the proper way to use it imo.
[/b][/quote]
Fair enough although shouldnt the members who make the community have a say in it as well? Without us this forum wouldn't be, with Mod's it would be a hell hole but itstill would be, Power to the people, power to Sam.
This Is My Clone
BT Rep: +19
Fair enough although shouldnt the members who make the community have a say in it as well? Without us this forum wouldn't be, with Mod's it would be a hell hole but itstill would be, Power to the people, power to SamOriginally posted by peerzyboy+21 July 2004 - 22:03--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (peerzyboy @ 21 July 2004 - 22:03)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>Originally posted by jetje@21 July 2004 - 11:48
<!--QuoteBegin-peerzyboy@21 July 2004 - 13:39
Error403 gave one reason as to why Samsamsamsam was banned was he had the highest warn level on the forum, is that even possible to check everybodys warn levelw ith a tool?
His was the highest, every mod that saw it once would never forget it. no tools needed for that
But he wasn't banned because he had such a high level! But when he came up for discussion it was taken into the debate... so the proper way to use it imo.
when you give power to people, look what happens...George W Bush is the American President, Tony Blair is the Brittish Prime Minister and John Howard is the Australian Prime Minister...giving power to the people does not have such a great success rate
.
when you give power to people, look what happens...George W Bush is the American President, Tony Blair is the Brittish Prime Minister and John Howard is the Australian Prime Minister...giving power to the people does not have such a great success rateOriginally posted by Celerystalksme+21 July 2004 - 13:10--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Celerystalksme @ 21 July 2004 - 13:10)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>Originally posted by peerzyboy@21 July 2004 - 22:03
Originally posted by jetje@21 July 2004 - 11:48
<!--QuoteBegin-peerzyboy@21 July 2004 - 13:39
Error403 gave one reason as to why Samsamsamsam was banned was he had the highest warn level on the forum, is that even possible to check everybodys warn levelw ith a tool?
His was the highest, every mod that saw it once would never forget it. no tools needed for that
But he wasn't banned because he had such a high level! But when he came up for discussion it was taken into the debate... so the proper way to use it imo.
Fair enough although shouldnt the members who make the community have a say in it as well? Without us this forum wouldn't be, with Mod's it would be a hell hole but itstill would be, Power to the people, power to Sam
Those are put there by rigged systems in any case.
When did you see a voting system where you could say "none of the above", and have your vote taken notice of?
I suppose the options here would be
1) Ban for life
2) Ban for 100 years
3) Ban until 2104
.Political correctness is based on the principle that it's possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.
Poster
Those are put there by rigged systems in any case.Originally posted by lynx+21 July 2004 - 12:23--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (lynx @ 21 July 2004 - 12:23)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>Originally posted by Celerystalksme@21 July 2004 - 13:10
Originally posted by peerzyboy@21 July 2004 - 22:03
Originally posted by jetje@21 July 2004 - 11:48
<!--QuoteBegin-peerzyboy@21 July 2004 - 13:39
Error403 gave one reason as to why Samsamsamsam was banned was he had the highest warn level on the forum, is that even possible to check everybodys warn levelw ith a tool?
His was the highest, every mod that saw it once would never forget it. no tools needed for that
But he wasn't banned because he had such a high level! But when he came up for discussion it was taken into the debate... so the proper way to use it imo.
Fair enough although shouldnt the members who make the community have a say in it as well? Without us this forum wouldn't be, with Mod's it would be a hell hole but itstill would be, Power to the people, power to Sam
when you give power to people, look what happens...George W Bush is the American President, Tony Blair is the Brittish Prime Minister and John Howard is the Australian Prime Minister...giving power to the people does not have such a great success rate
When did you see a voting system where you could say "none of the above", and have your vote taken notice of?
I suppose the options here would be
1) Ban for life
2) Ban for 100 years
3) Ban until 2104 [/b][/quote]
So Sam's best bet would be to get himself cryogenically frozen for 100 years and then he would be allowed on the forum?
Sweet.
This Is My Clone
BT Rep: +19
So Sam's best bet would be to get himself cryogenically frozen for 100 years and then he would be allowed on the forum?Originally posted by Withcheese+21 July 2004 - 22:29--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Withcheese @ 21 July 2004 - 22:29)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>Originally posted by lynx@21 July 2004 - 12:23
Originally posted by Celerystalksme@21 July 2004 - 13:10
Originally posted by peerzyboy@21 July 2004 - 22:03
Originally posted by jetje@21 July 2004 - 11:48
<!--QuoteBegin-peerzyboy@21 July 2004 - 13:39
Error403 gave one reason as to why Samsamsamsam was banned was he had the highest warn level on the forum, is that even possible to check everybodys warn levelw ith a tool?
His was the highest, every mod that saw it once would never forget it. no tools needed for that
But he wasn't banned because he had such a high level! But when he came up for discussion it was taken into the debate... so the proper way to use it imo.
Fair enough although shouldnt the members who make the community have a say in it as well? Without us this forum wouldn't be, with Mod's it would be a hell hole but itstill would be, Power to the people, power to Sam
when you give power to people, look what happens...George W Bush is the American President, Tony Blair is the Brittish Prime Minister and John Howard is the Australian Prime Minister...giving power to the people does not have such a great success rate
Those are put there by rigged systems in any case.
When did you see a voting system where you could say "none of the above", and have your vote taken notice of?
I suppose the options here would be
1) Ban for life
2) Ban for 100 years
3) Ban until 2104
Sweet.
see, things work out in the end...i think
Poster
see, things work out in the end...i thinkOriginally posted by Celerystalksme+21 July 2004 - 12:31--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Celerystalksme @ 21 July 2004 - 12:31)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>Originally posted by Withcheese@21 July 2004 - 22:29
Originally posted by lynx@21 July 2004 - 12:23
Originally posted by Celerystalksme@21 July 2004 - 13:10
Originally posted by peerzyboy@21 July 2004 - 22:03
Originally posted by jetje@21 July 2004 - 11:48
<!--QuoteBegin-peerzyboy@21 July 2004 - 13:39
Error403 gave one reason as to why Samsamsamsam was banned was he had the highest warn level on the forum, is that even possible to check everybodys warn levelw ith a tool?
His was the highest, every mod that saw it once would never forget it. no tools needed for that
But he wasn't banned because he had such a high level! But when he came up for discussion it was taken into the debate... so the proper way to use it imo.
Fair enough although shouldnt the members who make the community have a say in it as well? Without us this forum wouldn't be, with Mod's it would be a hell hole but itstill would be, Power to the people, power to Sam
when you give power to people, look what happens...George W Bush is the American President, Tony Blair is the Brittish Prime Minister and John Howard is the Australian Prime Minister...giving power to the people does not have such a great success rate
Those are put there by rigged systems in any case.
When did you see a voting system where you could say "none of the above", and have your vote taken notice of?
I suppose the options here would be
1) Ban for life
2) Ban for 100 years
3) Ban until 2104
So Sam's best bet would be to get himself cryogenically frozen for 100 years and then he would be allowed on the forum?
Sweet.
Obviously Sam will have a lot of reading to catch up on and will have to chat with our grandchildren...
Infact Error403 has already posted that in 6 months if Sam is not drinking as muich and promis to clean up his act he would ahve no problem with him comoing back, could be Sam's christmas present.
This Is My Clone
BT Rep: +19
but christmas is 5 months and 4 days away...so it can't be a Christmas present...don't lie to the childrenOriginally posted by peerzyboy@21 July 2004 - 22:58
Infact Error403 has already posted that in 6 months if Sam is not drinking as muich and promis to clean up his act he would ahve no problem with him comoing back, could be Sam's christmas present.
Well a late christmas present.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
[/b][/quote]
.
Bookmarks