i don't think that anyone ever thought that Bush or Clinton was to blame but they should both accept responsibility for their short sightedness. Bush takes a lot of the brunt because it happened on his watch. The USA was outwitted because of its own arrogance and it's sad that it took something like this to wake up to reality.Originally posted by vidcc+23 July 2004 - 16:35--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (vidcc @ 23 July 2004 - 16:35)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-j2k4@23 July 2004 - 14:13
Ironically, it doesn't blame Bush more than it does Clinton; what do you make of that?
I am actually waiting for someone to make something of the Iran section. The report concludes that Iran probably had no idea of the events that were to take place but it was raised that they allowed the 9/11 gang "unfettered passage" through the country.
I feel somehow that this is unfair to raise (given the facts that i have at present) and that it will stir up accusations. Remember that the USA allowed these men unresticted travel within the US right upto the moment of impact. [/b][/quote]
If any president is to blame, it's Clinton. Bush was only in office for what, five months (estimation) before 9/11? Those terrorist were plotting attacks for six years. Who do you think had a better opportunity the catch them??
Bookmarks