Liberals Fuck You If You Don't Vote Conservative

[longboneslinger]

If you meant to elicit an answer exclusively from 'Bone, I'll gladly forego any elaboration.

Gee thanks, j2k4!
By the way, where does the 'hatemonger' come from? I've never even acted hateful. Why is it that Liberals yell so loudly for free-speech but when we exercise our right to free-speech we're labeled "pablum puking", "homophobes" and "hate mongers". You scream for peace yet attack everyone who disagrees with you. Hypocrites bore me. A liberal will scream he/she has the moral high ground even when sinking in quick sand. Let'em sink. Who need'em anyway. I don't hate anyone, just tired of those with no moral fiber.

I wasn't gonna, but since I've been abandoned , here goes:

1. Do you think the sodomy law was unjust?

Yes. I really don't care what you do. I really don't.

2. If abortion is unjust do you also think "pulling out" is as well?

No. I don't worry about what might have been. It's like the silly argument that man was only 'alive' after God breathed life into him. That was dirt. There is a huge differenct between 'pulling out', a pile of dirt and a human fetus. You may see this point, some won't.

. What are your thoughts on the "morning after pill?

Abortion is abortion. Hard to say if you don't know your pregnant. Try this. You drop a bomb down a hole where people may be (homeless, whatever) and walk away. Did you kill somebody? Leaving out police investigations and such, you'd never know. Is it ok because you'd never know? Actually think about before lighting your flamethrowers.

4. If every woman that is pregnant is to have their child, do you think they should be forced to take care of him/her?

No. They should, but some are just to irresponsible. Adoption is always a viable alternative.
[/QUOTE]5. If a child is going to be born deformed are you still against abortion?

Yes. A human life is still sacred. Of course, some whould argue, if the poor thing is going to be in horrible pain, there's a whole knew dillema. Who are we to judge? Not I.

. Should a child be aborted to save the mother if the child will be born healthy?

In this instance, I'd leave it up to the family, mainly the mother. That's a terrible choice. Abortion is horrible enough.

7. Do agree with homosexual civil unions?

Here come the flames. No. That's just a stepping stome to gay marriage. Sorry. No hate, I just see as one more attack on heterosexual marriage. God says it's wrong, so recognizing it is wrong.

8. What are we supossed to do with/to homosexuals?

?? Nothing. Let'em live as they wish. Just don't ask for special privileges. It's wrong. Why should I condone that? Who's next? Pedophiles? Not putting them in the same catagory, just generalizing for the sake of argument.

9. Are homosexuals born that way or do they "learn" the lifestyle?

I really don't know. I believe that it's a learned behavior. I could be wrong. It's really irrelevant to me since it's a sin. a sin is a choice. Born or learned is completely irrelevant since man is given a choice whether to indulge or not.

10. Should prospective parents be allowed to adopt outside the US when there are plenty of unadopted naturalized babies?

I don't have a problem with it. I whould hope that adoptive parents would stay within the their own countries, but it's their choice. I certainly wouldn't make an issue of it.

11. Do you think slavery helped make this country great? [QUOTE]
While I agree with j2k4 ( shocker ) that this is a leading question I'll answer. NO. We are great in spite of slavery. Slavery is undiluted savagery. That it's still practiced today is even worse.

Enjoy. I've 'homophobed' and 'pablum puked' enough for one day.
Later,
BoNe

PS-To spamhandel. I'd appreciate it if you'd leave my father out of this. I've yet to impugn your father, nor will I. My father passed away in 1995 from Parkinsons Disease. It's a horrible thing to watch. Lets keep this a civilized debate among adults, please.

[vidcc]

Originally posted by longboneslinger@18 August 2004 - 18:22
Nothing. Let'em live as they wish. Just don't ask for special privileges.

Not going to argue with most of your answers as they are your opinions and as one that you would probably call a "liberal" i agree with free speech even if i don't agree with what i am hearing.

However i have to pick up on the above quote.

They don't want "special privilidges". they just want equality

Why should I condone that? Who's next? Pedophiles? Not putting them in the same catagory, just generalizing for the sake of argument

I realise you are not saying that homosexuals are Pedophiles but that is such an unfair way to make an arguement and yet one that seems to crop up from the opposing side of gay unions with a great deal of frequency. Homosexuals are consenting adults and have exactly the same rights as you enjoy...only you wish to deny those rights because of a belief in something that not everyone believes in...GOD

[Busyman]

Originally posted by longboneslinger@18 August 2004 - 20:22

If you meant to elicit an answer exclusively from 'Bone, I'll gladly forego any elaboration.

Gee thanks, j2k4!
By the way, where does the 'hatemonger' come from? I've never even acted hateful. Why is it that Liberals yell so loudly for free-speech but when we exercise our right to free-speech we're labeled "pablum puking", "homophobes" and "hate mongers". You scream for peace yet attack everyone who disagrees with you. Hypocrites bore me. A liberal will scream he/she has the moral high ground even when sinking in quick sand. Let'em sink. Who need'em anyway. I don't hate anyone, just tired of those with no moral fiber.

I wasn't gonna, but since I've been abandoned , here goes:

1. Do you think the sodomy law was unjust?

Yes. I really don't care what you do. I really don't.

2. If abortion is unjust do you also think "pulling out" is as well?

No. I don't worry about what might have been. It's like the silly argument that man was only 'alive' after God breathed life into him. That was dirt. There is a huge differenct between 'pulling out', a pile of dirt and a human fetus. You may see this point, some won't.

. What are your thoughts on the "morning after pill?

Abortion is abortion. Hard to say if you don't know your pregnant. Try this. You drop a bomb down a hole where people may be (homeless, whatever) and walk away. Did you kill somebody? Leaving out police investigations and such, you'd never know. Is it ok because you'd never know? Actually think about before lighting your flamethrowers.

4. If every woman that is pregnant is to have their child, do you think they should be forced to take care of him/her?

No. They should, but some are just to irresponsible. Adoption is always a viable alternative.

5. If a child is going to be born deformed are you still against abortion?

Yes. A human life is still sacred. Of course, some whould argue, if the poor thing is going to be in horrible pain, there's a whole knew dillema. Who are we to judge? Not I.

. Should a child be aborted to save the mother if the child will be born healthy?

In this instance, I'd leave it up to the family, mainly the mother. That's a terrible choice. Abortion is horrible enough.

7. Do agree with homosexual civil unions?

Here come the flames. No. That's just a stepping stome to gay marriage. Sorry. No hate, I just see as one more attack on heterosexual marriage. God says it's wrong, so recognizing it is wrong.

8. What are we supossed to do with/to homosexuals?

?? Nothing. Let'em live as they wish. Just don't ask for special privileges. It's wrong. Why should I condone that? Who's next? Pedophiles? Not putting them in the same catagory, just generalizing for the sake of argument.

9. Are homosexuals born that way or do they "learn" the lifestyle?

I really don't know. I believe that it's a learned behavior. I could be wrong. It's really irrelevant to me since it's a sin. a sin is a choice. Born or learned is completely irrelevant since man is given a choice whether to indulge or not.

10. Should prospective parents be allowed to adopt outside the US when there are plenty of unadopted naturalized babies?

I don't have a problem with it. I whould hope that adoptive parents would stay within the their own countries, but it's their choice. I certainly wouldn't make an issue of it.

11. Do you think slavery helped make this country great?

While I agree with j2k4 ( shocker ) that this is a leading question I'll answer. NO. We are great in spite of slavery. Slavery is undiluted savagery. That it's still practiced today is even worse.

Enjoy. I've 'homophobed' and 'pablum puked' enough for one day.
Later,
BoNe

PS-To spamhandel. I'd appreciate it if you'd leave my father out of this. I've yet to impugn your father, nor will I. My father passed away in 1995 from Parkinsons Disease. It's a horrible thing to watch. Lets keep this a civilized debate among adults, please.

I applaud you answering those questions and thank you.

The last answer was an amalgamation of j2k4's non-answer and vid's answer and not your own.

Anyway thanks for the first 10.

I share many of your views.

However I know A pretty decent amount about the Bible and you are trying to have some things both ways.

If one claims Christian doctrine should apply to US law go all the way with it or STHU!!!

[spinningfreemanny]

Well answered,

[j2k4]

Originally posted by Busyman@18 August 2004 - 21:46


The last answer was an amalgamation of j2k4's non-answer and vid's answer and not your own.

WTF?

Just 'cuz I copped vid's answer?

Do you really want to hear me at my cynical and non-constructive worst?

No...no you don't, and neither do I want to demonstrate.

Good to see you all getting along better, though.

[Busyman]

Originally posted by j2k4+19 August 2004 - 15:41--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (j2k4 @ 19 August 2004 - 15:41)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Busyman@18 August 2004 - 21:46


The last answer was an amalgamation of j2k4&#39;s non-answer and vid&#39;s answer and not your own.

WTF?

Just &#39;cuz I copped vid&#39;s answer?

Do you really want to hear me at my cynical and non-constructive worst?

No...no you don&#39;t, and neither do I want to demonstrate.

Good to see you all getting along better, though. [/b][/quote]
Actually jaykay, the above quote was aimed at bone as was the original questions.

[j2k4]

Still...

I was struck at the disconnect indicated by your question, B.

I would have thought that had the question been lurking in your head, you&#39;d have asked me, and some time ago, too.

I&#39;ve since wondered just what &#39;Bone said that prompted the question, as it didn&#39;t seem to be YOU, y&#39;know?

EDIT:

It just seems like you&#39;d have to scour, say, Gulfport, Mississippi, to find someone who would give you the answer you were looking for.

I&#39;m sorry, I just think this country has gotten beyond that level of hatred.

Hope I&#39;m not wrong.

[Biggles]

I forego comment on the religious stuff - we each approach these things from different cultures and standpoints. One can claim absolute authority from one&#39;s own scriptures, traditions or (non)beliefs, but it doesn&#39;t cut any ice with someone else&#39;s. However, one cannot legislation for such things. One should simply live it - anything else is Government interference where government has no business.

Notwithstanding the reasons for it being asked, Busyman&#39;s question 11. is interesting. There are two ways of looking it at it 1) the economic and 2) the social/moral.

In answer to the first, slavery served the Americas well for the best part of 300 years and provided substantial wealth and set up an elite that still calls the shots in many of the countries of that continent today. So in that respect it did provide some of the foundation stones that paved the way to economic prosperity.

In the second part, I think it would be fair to say that the social and moral sore it caused is still an underlying infection 150 years after its abolition.

It would then, be reasonable to surmise that almost any country in the Americas would be different today if it had developed in a different way.



Perhaps more like Canada which had a more limited experience of such things.

[j2k4]

Originally posted by Biggles@19 August 2004 - 16:47
I forego comment on the religious stuff - we each approach these things from different cultures and standpoints. One can claim absolute authority from one&#39;s own scriptures, traditions or (non)beliefs, but it doesn&#39;t cut any ice with someone else&#39;s. However, one cannot legislation for such things. One should simply live it - anything else is Government interference where government has no business.

Notwithstanding the reasons for it being asked, Busyman&#39;s question 11. is interesting. There are two ways of looking it at it 1) the economic and 2) the social/moral.

In answer to the first, slavery served the Americas well for the best part of 300 years and provided substantial wealth and set up an elite that still calls the shots in many of the countries of that continent today. So in that respect it did provide some of the foundation stones that paved the way to economic prosperity.

In the second part, I think it would be fair to say that the social and moral sore it caused is still an underlying infection 150 years after its abolition.

It would then, be reasonable to surmise that almost any country in the Americas would be different today if it had developed in a different way.



Perhaps more like Canada which had a more limited experience of such things.&nbsp;

As usual, Biggles, you have the diplomatic eye trained, while I stew over perception.

Thank you, and well done.

Perhaps I should dawdle a bit before I pronounce, yes?

BTW-

I was reminded today by someone beside whom I qualify as a mental incompetent that I am not terribly conversant in matters religious; I am chastened thus, and not inclined to offer defense.

Of course, I&#39;m in my cups at the moment, too.

[Busyman]

Originally posted by Biggles@19 August 2004 - 17:47
Notwithstanding the reasons for it being asked, Busyman&#39;s question 11. is interesting. There are two ways of looking it at it 1) the economic and 2) the social/moral.

In answer to the first, slavery served the Americas well for the best part of 300 years and provided substantial wealth and set up an elite that still calls the shots in many of the countries of that continent today. So in that respect it did provide some of the foundation stones that paved the way to economic prosperity.

In the second part, I think it would be fair to say that the social and moral sore it caused is still an underlying infection 150 years after its abolition.

It would then, be reasonable to surmise that almost any country in the Americas would be different today if it had developed in a different way.



Perhaps more like Canada which had a more limited experience of such things.

That man&#39;s a janeyus&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;

Biggles you have my utmost respect for answering that question.

Very concise my man. (and true)

Amazing that you are not from here but are so enlightened.

--End of ball smacking.