Luckilly you are not in the U.S. with sentiments like that. I can say, maybe after a nights sleep maybe you can think about that. Any leader of a civilized nation with a strong army is a "danger" but shit some fuckbird saying blah blah blah cause they hide under the aegis of "Islam" when it sounds like "anarchy" is just another fuckbird with power over bad people.Originally posted by Rat Faced@1 August 2004 - 00:06
I hate to admit that the world would be better off without the guy in the whitehouse.
Or Paul look it it this way:
In real life you would have dinner with Bush I am sure you would find him much like you in his wants and desires, whereas were you to dine with Mr. bin Laden I am sure you would come away wanting a nice shower.
Or in another sense. In 10 years you will laugh at this I assure you. The only reason "Bush" scrares you and the rest of the world is maybe that you have all known that the U.S. is powerful, and maybe Viet Nam confused many of you that was not so, and now it makes you nervous to see that the U.S. is still mighty. Is it the U.S. and our might that scares you or Bush? Damn, I would have been more afraid of Reagan. Oh wait, you all were, and he didn't kill the world.
Just like Bush won't despite some peoples hysterics. My opinion cause give me the fucking gun and I would put one in Mr. Bin Ladens head myself, and that is truth, while I would bow to Mr. Bush as what he is- the head of the greatest nation on earth.
Like it or not.
And you KNEW that was coming did you not?
-SJ™
Bookmarks