cool thanks for the detailsOriginally posted by (>Zero Cool<)+1 August 2004 - 16:40--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE ((>Zero Cool<) @ 1 August 2004 - 16:40)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-cpt_azad@2 August 2004 - 00:26
iD really know the meaning of optimization. i got a 2.2 ghz OCed at 2.8 ghz (the other processor didn't work out, heatsink messed it up bad, real bad). 1 gb ram PC3200, geforce fx5200 (that's where the bottleneck is) and a 120 gig hDD on a really old mobo. but i still play at 800x600 with medium quality with some things turned off (such as AA and AF, and sometimes specular lighting [SL] bcuz SL kinda slows it down to 25 fps, but that's still playable). all in all i'm getting 39 fps avg. capped at 60. this game not only looks good but runs so smoothly.
![]()
I should be ok then, when I eventually get it[/b][/quote]
yup should work on pretty much any rig (worked even on my friends 1 ghz machine LMFAO, the min is supposed to be 1.5 if i remember correctly)
Bookmarks