ATI only
ATI only
Jeff Loomis: He's so good, he doesn't need to be dead to have a tribute.
Will this tweak will take away as much image quality away as the last one did (the one where you have to make a file, and then run it in the console in the game)?![]()
anyone know when u can get the bfg? i saw it in a locked room, but i don't have the code to some sargent/general person. where do u get it?
nope, i don't know wat ur talking about, that performanc.cfg didn't do anything to image quality on my end, infact i turned it up to 1024x768 high quality special effects all on wit 4xAA and 2xAF, still getting 50+fps avg wit that tweak, as for the ati tweak, no it will not degrade quality can't even tell the diff if it does cuz i know i couldn'tOriginally posted by opivykid@9 August 2004 - 11:21
Will this tweak will take away as much image quality away as the last one did (the one where you have to make a file, and then run it in the console in the game)?![]()
![]()
Jeff Loomis: He's so good, he doesn't need to be dead to have a tribute.
the code is 931 (i think the name is abrams, the code was originally 901 but then "security" updated it to 931 because codes cannot have the number 0 in emOriginally posted by abu_has_the_power@9 August 2004 - 12:39
anyone know when u can get the bfg? i saw it in a locked room, but i don't have the code to some sargent/general person. where do u get it?)
Jeff Loomis: He's so good, he doesn't need to be dead to have a tribute.
lmfao funniest thing ive seen in a while
http://www.extremefunnyhumor.com/movs/doom.wmv
Jeff Loomis: He's so good, he doesn't need to be dead to have a tribute.
nope, i don't know wat ur talking about, that performanc.cfg didn't do anything to image quality on my end, infact i turned it up to 1024x768 high quality special effects all on wit 4xAA and 2xAF, still getting 50+fps avg wit that tweak, as for the ati tweak, no it will not degrade quality can't even tell the diff if it does cuz i know i couldn'tOriginally posted by cpt_azad+9 August 2004 - 20:05--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (cpt_azad @ 9 August 2004 - 20:05)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-opivykid@9 August 2004 - 11:21
Will this tweak will take away as much image quality away as the last one did (the one where you have to make a file, and then run it in the console in the game)?![]()
[/b][/quote]
I think he means when you add the .cfg file tweak you recomended, it removed shadows, specular lighting, ect. thus the lower 'image quality'. ( Wow I sound smart using the word thus!)
I think he means when you add the .cfg file tweak you recomended, it removed shadows, specular lighting, ect. thus the lower 'image quality'. ( Wow I sound smart using the word thus!Originally posted by HardcoreGamer+9 August 2004 - 16:59--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (HardcoreGamer @ 9 August 2004 - 16:59)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>Originally posted by cpt_azad@9 August 2004 - 20:05
<!--QuoteBegin-opivykid@9 August 2004 - 11:21
Will this tweak will take away as much image quality away as the last one did (the one where you have to make a file, and then run it in the console in the game)?![]()
nope, i don't know wat ur talking about, that performanc.cfg didn't do anything to image quality on my end, infact i turned it up to 1024x768 high quality special effects all on wit 4xAA and 2xAF, still getting 50+fps avg wit that tweak, as for the ati tweak, no it will not degrade quality can't even tell the diff if it does cuz i know i couldn't![]()
) [/b][/quote]
not really, my shadows are on and so is specular (wow i also sound smart) infact i have all the special effects turned on, remember wat i said, that tweak was for comps to run it at high fps (performance), and i also remember saying a hundred times to EXPERIMENT , i took that tweak and tailored it to my needs and wants and it runs great even wit all special effects on, at 1024x768 high detail blah blah blha (read previous post
)
Jeff Loomis: He's so good, he doesn't need to be dead to have a tribute.
not really, my shadows are on and so is specular (wow i also sound smartOriginally posted by cpt_azad+9 August 2004 - 21:21--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (cpt_azad @ 9 August 2004 - 21:21)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>Originally posted by HardcoreGamer@9 August 2004 - 16:59
Originally posted by cpt_azad@9 August 2004 - 20:05
<!--QuoteBegin-opivykid@9 August 2004 - 11:21
Will this tweak will take away as much image quality away as the last one did (the one where you have to make a file, and then run it in the console in the game)?![]()
nope, i don't know wat ur talking about, that performanc.cfg didn't do anything to image quality on my end, infact i turned it up to 1024x768 high quality special effects all on wit 4xAA and 2xAF, still getting 50+fps avg wit that tweak, as for the ati tweak, no it will not degrade quality can't even tell the diff if it does cuz i know i couldn't![]()
I think he means when you add the .cfg file tweak you recomended, it removed shadows, specular lighting, ect. thus the lower 'image quality'. ( Wow I sound smart using the word thus!)
) infact i have all the special effects turned on, remember wat i said, that tweak was for comps to run it at high fps (performance), and i also remember saying a hundred times to EXPERIMENT , i took that tweak and tailored it to my needs and wants and it runs great even wit all special effects on, at 1024x768 high detail blah blah blha (read previous post
) [/b][/quote]
Hmmm....I copied everything you said to do for the tweak and the tweak ended up turning off my specular and shadows and my fps wen't lower.I'm confused.
![]()
Hmmm....I copied everything you said to do for the tweak and the tweak ended up turning off my specular and shadows and my fps wen't lower.Originally posted by HardcoreGamer+9 August 2004 - 17:43--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (HardcoreGamer @ 9 August 2004 - 17:43)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>Originally posted by cpt_azad@9 August 2004 - 21:21
Originally posted by HardcoreGamer@9 August 2004 - 16:59
Originally posted by cpt_azad@9 August 2004 - 20:05
<!--QuoteBegin-opivykid@9 August 2004 - 11:21
Will this tweak will take away as much image quality away as the last one did (the one where you have to make a file, and then run it in the console in the game)?![]()
nope, i don't know wat ur talking about, that performanc.cfg didn't do anything to image quality on my end, infact i turned it up to 1024x768 high quality special effects all on wit 4xAA and 2xAF, still getting 50+fps avg wit that tweak, as for the ati tweak, no it will not degrade quality can't even tell the diff if it does cuz i know i couldn't![]()
I think he means when you add the .cfg file tweak you recomended, it removed shadows, specular lighting, ect. thus the lower 'image quality'. ( Wow I sound smart using the word thus!)
not really, my shadows are on and so is specular (wow i also sound smart) infact i have all the special effects turned on, remember wat i said, that tweak was for comps to run it at high fps (performance), and i also remember saying a hundred times to EXPERIMENT , i took that tweak and tailored it to my needs and wants and it runs great even wit all special effects on, at 1024x768 high detail blah blah blha (read previous post
)
I'm confused.
[/b][/quote]
that tweak was created too basically optimize doom3 further by turning off the little nice things like specular and shadows and stuff giving u a huge fps boost, but i changed mine so all the special effects stayed on and such, and i still got an fps boost. it certainly shouldn't lower ur fps especially if the tweak is the way it was meant to be (no specular no shadows no little nifty goodies)
![]()
Jeff Loomis: He's so good, he doesn't need to be dead to have a tribute.
Bookmarks