Why Play CSS?

**Harsh!** · 11-03-2004, 02:07 AM

Who the hell is Mario anyway???

**silent h3ro** · 11-03-2004, 02:10 AM

Originally Posted by Harsh!

Who the hell is Mario anyway???

:crying:

**Spicker** · 11-03-2004, 02:32 AM

i can play css at 1280xsomething with my fx5600

**mr. nails** · 11-03-2004, 12:38 PM

Originally Posted by HardcoreGamer

That X800 will help ALOT.

i'm thinking of a 6800 GT instead, but still sceptical at this point.

**Afronaut** · 11-03-2004, 12:44 PM

I've been playing few rounds CS-S (emporio) with some bots and whatnot, its not really that bad,
but I dont think it's really anything special either.

Them rolling barrels (physics in 2 words) are more of a annoyance.

The HL2, I hope, should be a bit better. CS-S is just a "shoodemup".

**orcutt989** · 11-04-2004, 02:48 AM

Why dont you get a version that actually works online such as the Luzifer version, which is completely delectable, and there hundreds of servers. And i still dont understand why this person is comparing Mario to Counter-Strike?

**mr. nails** · 11-05-2004, 02:38 PM

Originally Posted by orcutt989

And i still dont understand why this person is comparing Mario to Counter-Strike?

maybe for the simple fact that both are just graphically updated versions?

**orcutt989** · 11-05-2004, 08:47 PM

What?? Haha i am seriously confused by what you are talking about. Mario, is a side scrolling-32 bit or less game, whereas Counter Strike: Source is a first person shooter that...well i dont even know how many bits that would be but it depends on your graphics card. Therefore the two are not comparable. And CS:Source is not just graphically updated, the physics and everything else is also very life-like. Comparing the two games is like saying "What is better? Elephants or The Declaration of Independence?" "Spaceships or Bananas?" "Christopher Columbus, or Antarctica?" You are simply making a juxtaposition.