Gay Marriage

[hobbes]

Point please...

Let me know when you have it, then....relay it to me.

He has become what he has been told never to become.

Why?

He cannot defy his genetics.

You needed me to explain that?

[hobbes]

The bottom line is that you will cling to your opinion, no matter what is offered.

Busyman logic trumps the world, discussion is pointless.

[Busyman]

You haven't refuted anything, you have just offered your opinion, which stands in stark contrast to the opinion of the scientific community.

Why?

Obvious, you are a bisexual that keeps expecting the rest of us to admit that we will take what is available.

Sorry, not the case.

"You enjoy what you enjoy" is refuted easily as you try to apply it to "you enjoy what enjoy because you were born that way."

Not need to go further. It was an idiotic inference.

The scientific community has been wrong already. When are they going to come up with this dangblasted gay chemical?

Oh and eat shit, cock bastard.

[manker]

Obvious, you are a bisexual that keeps expecting the rest of us to admit that we will take what is available.

I think this has become glaringly obvious the more that the topic is discussed.

[Busyman]

He has become what he has been told never to become.

Why?

He cannot defy his genetics.

You needed me to explain that?

I told my boy to like football and we are a football family. Well......he doesn't like it.

Too easy.

I've heard it all before.

Scienticalize the non-football chemical.

[Busyman]

I think this has become glaringly obvious the more that the topic is discussed.

Your a bitch, wanker.

I think that's obvious.

[Busyman]

The bottom line is that you will cling to your opinion, no matter what is offered.

Busyman logic trumps the world, discussion is pointless.

What's funny is nothing else has been offered except

"they are born gay, case closed"

You are a riot.

[hobbes]

Ok boys, have a good night. Good chat.

[manker]

Your a bitch, wanker.

I think that's obvious.

Yeah, yeah.

I'm half serious. What other explanation is there for you refusing to see what everyone else in the scientific world takes as a given.

At some points in this thread I've actually laughed out loud - the bit where you say that because there is a lot of lesbian porn means that women can be 'turned' easier than men. NO!! It means men pay for porn and they like looking at pussy X 2.

Aaaaanyway, I won't push this point. :blush:

[Busyman]

Yeah, yeah.

I'm half serious. What other explanation is there for you refusing to see what everyone else in the scientific world takes as a given.

At some points in this thread I've actually laughed out loud - the bit where you say that because there is a lot of lesbian porn means that women can be 'turned' easier than men. NO!! It means men pay for porn and they like looking at pussy X 2.

Aaaaanyway, I won't push this point. :blush:

What has the scientific community given?

I tend to look farther than what scientists say that hasn't been proven.

Btw I've addressed the the pay for porn bit already.

I don't even call these women being turned. I call it trying something different that they probably grew up being against....like them being ass-fucked, or sucking dick. Also you can cut the shit...female on female action is more widely accepted than male on male. It is what it is.

The reason for me not believing gays are not born that way is through what I see.

There are too may instances of it not fitting the "born with" mantra.

It sounds reeeeaallly nice to believe it but it doesn't jibe with real world situations. It also pigeon holes any homosexual behavior.

A woman decides to eat another's twat....oh man I didn't know you had the gay gene? We are pigeon holing mere behavior.

Regarding the gay marriage issue, I admittedly would vote against it if it was a referendum.

If I was a judge, I would vote for it. I really don't see how a judge could vote against it or do a cop out like "leave it up to the states."

Yet they have.