Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 38

Thread: Hiroshima

  1. #21
    Retired
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    12,488
    Quote Originally Posted by Withcheese
    Why are you making off-topic posts in a serious discussion?
    Because it is posted in the lounge...

  2. Lounge   -   #22
    DanB's Avatar Smoke weed everyday
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    London, so fuck y'all
    Age
    45
    Posts
    20,595
    The Lounge isn't just a full on spamfest



    well not all the time anyway

  3. Lounge   -   #23
    RPerry's Avatar Synergy BT Rep: Bad Rep
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Lakeland, Florida
    Age
    50
    Posts
    3,268
    enough of the time that it doesn't matter I guess....

  4. Lounge   -   #24
    Cheese's Avatar Poster
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    is everything.
    Age
    46
    Posts
    15,287
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr JP Fugley
    Listen matey, some of us post some bloody good stuff here.

    So a little respect would be in order.

    Oh and as Santayana said "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it", to keep on topic and away from these spammers.
    Unfortunately I think I got the idea for my post from British Buffy clone Hex
    Last edited by Withcheese; 11-14-2004 at 04:45 PM.

  5. Lounge   -   #25
    DanB's Avatar Smoke weed everyday
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    London, so fuck y'all
    Age
    45
    Posts
    20,595
    Quote Originally Posted by Withcheese
    Unfortunately I think I got the idea for my post from British Buffy clone Hex. Hex

    I watched the first ep of that and didn't really like it. Has it got any better then?

  6. Lounge   -   #26
    lynx's Avatar .
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Yorkshire, England
    Posts
    9,759
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr JP Fugley
    Listen matey, some of us post some bloody good stuff here.

    So a little respect would be in order.

    Oh and as Santayana said "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it", to keep on topic and away from these spammers.
    I thought he said "Oye como va". At least, that's how I heard it.
    .
    Political correctness is based on the principle that it's possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.

  7. Lounge   -   #27

  8. Lounge   -   #28
    bigboab's Avatar Poster BT Rep: +1
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    29,621
    IMO the bombs were to dropped not to end the war with Japan but to stop Russia invading Japan. Russia was in a position to invade Japan at a moments notice. Had they done so they would have controlled the whole area, with no chance of the 'Western' alliance of regaining it.

    America at that time wanted to invade Russia. After the fall of Berlin they wanted to carry on to Moscow. Without Japan as a base and considering the Himalayas they could ony have invaded from the European front. Their chances of winning that was zilch. Especially as the rest of the Western Alliance refused to carry on to Russia. Russia had more land forces than all the other countries put together.
    The best way to keep a secret:- Tell everyone not to tell anyone.

  9. Lounge   -   #29
    http://www.worldwar2database.com/html/frame5.htm

    Germany 780,000 civilians killed
    Japan 672,000 civilians killed

    While I agree with the fact that a nuclear war would be horrendous, There were less Japanese civilians killed by the 2 atomic bombs dropped there than there were by the thousands dropped on Germany by the British, French, and the Americans. I personally do not believe there would have been any less civilian casualties in Japan had the Atomic bombs not been dropped than there were when we did drop the bombs. I sincerely believe there would have been considerably more casualties on both sides.

    2 planes, 2 bombs, 672,000 civilians killed.
    thousands of planes, thousands of bombs, 780,000 civilians killed.

    I have to ask here, which was better?


    It's more prudent to spend time figuring out what's right than who's right

  10. Lounge   -   #30
    kAb's Avatar Poster
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    2,583
    Quote Originally Posted by CloudSeeder
    http://www.worldwar2database.com/html/frame5.htm

    Germany 780,000 civilians killed
    Japan 672,000 civilians killed

    While I agree with the fact that a nuclear war would be horrendous, There were less Japanese civilians killed by the 2 atomic bombs dropped there than there were by the thousands dropped on Germany by the British, French, and the Americans. I personally do not believe there would have been any less civilian casualties in Japan had the Atomic bombs not been dropped than there were when we did drop the bombs. I sincerely believe there would have been considerably more casualties on both sides.

    2 planes, 2 bombs, 672,000 civilians killed.
    thousands of planes, thousands of bombs, 780,000 civilians killed.

    I have to ask here, which was better?
    Which was better?

    Well with 2 bombs, and 672,000 civilians killed, common sense tells you that with one less bomb, half as many people would be killed.

    Thousands of bombs, well, not nearly as many lives would be spared if one bomb was not dropped.

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •