Poster
BT Rep: +4
Actually, theres one I'm thinking of but can't remember the title.
It's on "Short Music For Short People", 30 second songs.
The lyrics are;
....All my shoes are leather.
And I don't care whether or not,
All the little animals would have been shot.
It's gonna drive me loopy all day now.
It'll be the first thing on, when I get home.
_________________________
Last edited by Alien5; Today at 12:51
effendi
That's Bigwig, aint it? I wouldn't swear to it mind.
I plan on beating him to death with his kids. I'll use them as a bludgeon on his face. -
--Good for them if they survive.
Poster
BT Rep: +4
It is, but whats it called?
It rawks!!!
_________________________
Last edited by Alien5; Today at 12:51
effendi
I duno, I'm talking to a mate on the phone and he says it's 'Freedom' - I think he's full of shite 'cause that's a really gay name.
I plan on beating him to death with his kids. I'll use them as a bludgeon on his face. -
--Good for them if they survive.
effendi
Googled and it's called Freegan
I plan on beating him to death with his kids. I'll use them as a bludgeon on his face. -
--Good for them if they survive.
Poster
BT Rep: +4
Thats sounds about right.
I will have to check later though.
Just to be sure.
_________________________
Last edited by Alien5; Today at 12:51
Simple Bystander
BT Rep: +7
Jesus - How long has it been since we last agreed?Originally Posted by manker
I'm probably gonna get flank but I am one to support using animals for necessary uses - The more common being food, the more touchy being animal research. Many of the medical advances of the past century have involved animal research at one stage or another, and the sacrifices of those animals has given many of those who protest it the medical health to do so. True, I'd love more human research involved (as is being the case nowadays) but while their use in research helps in finding cures and treatments for many ailments still around (especially cancer) then I'll feel thankful for their (involuntary) contribution rather than angry about it. Same kinda goes with food - Until rice is GM'd to give the RDA of every nutrient in meat, I'll keep eating it
What I do oppose is the unnecessary use of animals - Use of them in cosmetics (although the brands that Cherie Blair use could be excused, for all our sakes), and in needless hunting is pushing the use of animals too far. Even worse is for entertainment, ala the fox hunting.
I'm not one to consider a fox cute, but using a form of entertainment to control the population when other, less-suffering methods can be used is barbaric.
In the end however, this issue will be down to the classes - The lower-class want to put tabs on the upper class (as should have been done to the bastards decades ago), and the upper class aren't liking it imposed on them. Still, we can take comfort in that all they can do is delay it...
Last edited by Illuminati; 11-18-2004 at 02:56 PM.
n00b
i'm a lazy twunk so haven't read the thread, i can see arguements from both sides. if i was a farmer and a fox was bothering my animals and ruining my livelyhood i'd want the fox dead. however i hate toffs who ride horses and breed annoying dogs
Last edited by TheDave; 11-18-2004 at 02:05 PM.
Smoke weed everyday
There's nothing to stop the farmer shooting it with his shotgun
Poster
You could always breed foxes and go dog hunting...
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
), and in needless hunting is pushing the use of animals too far. Even worse is for entertainment, ala the fox hunting. 
Bookmarks