Your a bitch.Originally Posted by cpt_azad
I'd love to see you ass whooped.
Why not go to an address of my specification so some folks of mine can tape it?
STFU..ya gay pirate.
Your a bitch.Originally Posted by cpt_azad
I'd love to see you ass whooped.
Why not go to an address of my specification so some folks of mine can tape it?
STFU..ya gay pirate.
Silly bitch, your weapons cannot harm me. Don't you know who I am? I'm the Juggernaut, Bitchhhh!
Flies Like An Arrow, Flies Like An Apple
---12323---4552-----
2133--STRENGTH--8310
344---5--5301---3232
Yes Vid if:Originally Posted by vidccinvasion only if the Iranians refuse to cooperate and refuse to stop developments, and military action is a last resort.
well let's use Iraq as a mirror.... Bush does everything the same.Originally Posted by BigBank_Hank
it’s an election with no Democrats, in one of the whitest states in the union, where rich candidates pay $35 for your votes. Or, as Republicans call it, their vision for the future.
Well, so far everyone agrees that he wants to.
4
Iran is not iraq nor its Afaganistan, it has more power then any other country in middle east(Ever thought why irans Currency's down) and the main thing is strong public unity, during iraq iran war iran had notting and iraq was supported from many countries like USA but still fight countinued for 8 years without losing. think now.. iran with all this weapon power!! i dont think USA will do such a mistake.
now if u talk about Suria it would be another 1 week war for USA
Last edited by bawa@Klite_user; 11-22-2004 at 02:06 PM.
"You can be mad as a mad dog at the way things went; you can swear and curse the fates, but when it comes to the end, you have to let go"Benjamen button
care to expand on that?Originally Posted by 15%
it’s an election with no Democrats, in one of the whitest states in the union, where rich candidates pay $35 for your votes. Or, as Republicans call it, their vision for the future.
I will expand
Will Bush send troops to Iran
yes he will because it's the right thing to do
yes he will but it's the wrong thing to do
no he won't because it's the wrong thing to do
no, but only because of lack of manpower
no, but he should
I did not even know that the us was intending to do so
none of the options in the poll state otherwise
so i guess there is no choice hence according to this poll
the us has Definet plans on doing so.
hence
add more options
as for my opinion
finish one thing first before complaining about the next
thus mind your own business
Do i actually have a choice in caring ?
no
Do as you please - a threat is threat even if it is not a threat
this is not a threat
15 I do believe I said that in my original post that there aren’t enough options. There is no option on there about solving this problem diplomatically.
Thats because Bush doesnt know the meaning of that word, possibly...
Strange that the only country ever to use Nukes, is paranoid about anyone else developing them, and wont let the UN inspect (or stop development of) their own.
Even stranger that they are quite happy to put anyone in charge of that button (including someone suffering from Senile Dementia in the 80's).
The excuse that "Any Madman" can be put in charge of them just doesnt wash, when most of the world already think a madman is in charge of the largest collection of these weapons.
Bookmarks