Shouldn't this be in interwebworld?
╚════╩═╬════╝
Shouldn't this be in interwebworld?
pepper your angus
BT Rep: +10
Personally, I find mankers sig very offensive
There's far too much ankle showing
effendi
Originally Posted by 15%
I was thinking that his .html could do with a little spicing up. Maybe a javascript password to keep the children at bay, too :mockconcern:
I plan on beating him to death with his kids. I'll use them as a bludgeon on his face. -
--Good for them if they survive.
╚════╩═╬════╝
I agree
the genral layout is very amateur
but
definit 10 marks for getting straight to the point
*bigdaddy goes off to five diffrent leet webdesign forums - "Hi what do you think of my new website - any tips?*
there is no god
I side with jonno on this. I don't personally find it offensive, it is however not appropriate for a forum that has people of very young ages as members.
This is not to say that much of the other stuff we post is all that wholesome
it’s an election with no Democrats, in one of the whitest states in the union, where rich candidates pay $35 for your votes. Or, as Republicans call it, their vision for the future.
Poster
Any chance of a video on Empronium.us
Ad ministrator
Dam to late.
ONE MIN. NINE SEC.
technically, its not a link to a porno site. It is a link to a page that takes you there. "technically" not breaking the board rules.I break the rules, you guys go nuts.
Jonno
ONE MIN. NINE SEC.
Any chance of a video on Empronium.us
Oh bugger
BT Rep: +7
It may not be linked to a porno site, but did you have the permission of those girls to post their pictures?
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
It may not be linked to a porno site, but did you have the permission of those girls to post their pictures?
Bookmarks