Jaigandhi was too lazy to post but he wants to know which would perform better in games, etc.
His Athlon XP 2500+ which is OCed to 2.45ghz or an Athlon 64 3000+?
Jaigandhi was too lazy to post but he wants to know which would perform better in games, etc.
His Athlon XP 2500+ which is OCed to 2.45ghz or an Athlon 64 3000+?
btw its a 2500+M which is running at 2.45Ghz and the 64bit 3000+ socket 754 which runs at 2.0ghz
In 32 bit mode the overclocked 2500+M would be faster.
lol
Jeff Loomis: He's so good, he doesn't need to be dead to have a tribute.
This would......right? I thought more mhz = more speed.Athlon 64 3000+?
I dunno. I'll shut up now. 16 yr old ROSSCO knows twice what I know and he's asking so...
(that wasnt meant to offensive ROSSCO, your OK in my book no matter what they say. )
Last edited by Skizo; 12-11-2004 at 10:28 AM.
yo
its an amd 3000+ runs at 2.0Ghz and i overclocked my 2500+M to 2.45Ghz so i have more MHz so mine is like a 3500+(i think)Originally Posted by Skizo
btw its fun being lazy..
btw im getting a 160Gb WD 7200rpm 8mb cache hdd today so 160+80=240Gb!!!! w00t! too much g1g4ness
Last edited by jaigandhi5; 12-11-2004 at 12:23 PM.
hey, i just told him that if it's purely 32bit software they're comparing then it's going to be the 2500+ OCed that will be better.Originally Posted by Skizo
he wanted to ask though.
Originally Posted by Skizo
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!
more MHz DOESNT mean more speed (unless its the same type of chip)!!!!!
why do you think an AMD 2600+ is called an AMD 2600+ and not a 1.95GHz?
its n00bs w0rld
im soo l33t someone stole my mhz!!!!111eleven11
Bookmarks