Nintendo owner Hiroshi Yamaushi owns MS CEO!

[TheDave]

it was faked by a guy with an agenda. but the pokemon reference...

[Busyman]

lol @ ofbz

but on a serious not. EVERYTHING he said was true, Sony & M$ are greedy pigs, nothing else. this is why i've been a long time nintendo supporter, they have values. sony & M$ are just hell bent on "better graphics, sucky games with no story, and more money", same bullshit different day & game

and the part about the PSP had a good point, loading screens suck, especially when it comes to hand helds :\

Uh yeah....that's why you are a Nintendo supporter?

I don't care how greedy they are. If they have good games, I'm playin 'em.

PS2 has more good games than the GC and that's indisputable.

I support that.

[TheDave]

i dispute it. gc definatly has a better good game:bad game ratio than xbox, ps2 or pc.

nintendo are perfectionists and take that Pride thing a lot further than anyone else

[killer04]

Well i find that the GBA has lots of good games especially the RPG's etc...

[Busyman]

i dispute it. gc definatly has a better good game:bad game ratio than xbox, ps2 or pc.

nintendo are perfectionists and take that Pride thing a lot further than anyone else

The GC's good games are almost all made by Nintendo and then there's the Resident Evil games.

What's that.....15 games maybe?

Wind Waker
Ocarina Of Time
Metroid Prime
Metroid Prime Echoes
Super Mario Sunshine
Resident Evil 0
Resident Evil
Resident Evil 4
Metal Gear Solid Twin Snakes
Star Wars Rogue Squadron

keep going......that's 10

PS2

Ratchet & Clank
Ratchet & Clank Going Commando
Ratchet & Clank Up Your Arsenal
Jak & Daxter
Jak II
Jak III
Sly Cooper
Sly Cooper 2
Grand Theft Auto III
Grand Theft Auto Vice City
Grand Theft Auto San Andreas
Silent Hill 2
Silent Hill 4

I can easily keep going for a whole page of this thread, as anyone else could and that's only 13.

btw Who cares about the good:bad game ratio? It proves nothing.

Ya buy the games that are good.

[TheDave]

for a start i said ratio

gc was first with viewtiful joe
we got good weird games too like doshin the giant (even though its an n64 port) and animal crossing. 1080 snowboarding, pikmin, smash bros, mario party and f-zero.

we had 5 resi-evils which all sucked IMO especially compared to eternal darkness, now thats a real scary game.

yeah most the good exclusive games are in-house but is that such a bad thing, nintendo support themselves with games guaranteed to sell and experiment with the change.

[Busyman]

for a start i said ratio

gc was first with viewtiful joe
we got good weird games too like doshin the giant (even though its an n64 port) and animal crossing. 1080 snowboarding, pikmin, smash bros, mario party and f-zero.

we had 5 resi-evils which all sucked IMO especially compared to eternal darkness, now thats a real scary game.

yeah most the good exclusive games are in-house but is that such a bad thing, nintendo support themselves with games guaranteed to sell and experiment with the change.

For a start I said.....

PS2 has more good games than the GC and that's indisputable.

Then you said

i dispute it,

Again ratios mean nothing..

5 games made and they are all good versus

20 games made and 15 are good.

[TheDave]

wave race
harvest moon
luigi's mansion
warioware
paper mario (i haven't actually played it, i admit)

[TheDave]

Again ratios mean nothing..

ratios mean i higher standard.

so nintendo really are interested in publishing the very best games, not just the money for selling them

[Busyman]

ratios mean i higher standard.

so nintendo really are interested in publishing the very best games, not just the money for selling them

As a consumer, what do I care?

With the GC I have less choice. So you are saying that's a good thing.

Nintendo is also missed the ball on the online front.

Less game selection, but the few they have are good, and very little online play. What a grand combo.