Crappy skins

[manker]

I think this is a gay thread. Cool

[ziggyjuarez]

Wait a sec...Has it been gheyjacked??? Or cawkjackd???

[manker]

I duno. No inspiration here but have some

[ziggyjuarez]

Thanks.Man this is so gay...

[manker]

Yup.

[ziggyjuarez]

You bet your sweet ass...

[DanB]

hackysawked

[ziggyjuarez]

Well its the same thing.I guess both would work in this situation///

[hobbes]

I reckon it's just that it really has been posted loads of times before!

I thought you were carrying on the gay theme that gheymeister Ziggy set down this morning.



Edit: Wtf?!? Punctuation after the smiley!!11

I was doing that as well. You see, good comedy comes full circle. It hits you with all the elements of the forum. A joke that multitasks. , , and

[UKResident]

, please note that is at you, not with you.



That was the only attack in this thread, prior to the post quoted at the head of this post.

The thing which crippled this forum was trolls. However it is regaining it's strength and getting it's goodage back.

Thanks for the input btw. Positive criticism is always appreciated.

Hi Jim,Jp,Pol,Paul,Fugs or whatever you call yourself these days, l see you still act as though you own the place. How's Mary?

An Internet troll is a person who sends duplicitous messages to get angry responses. The term derives from the phrase "trolling for suckers" and ultimately from trolling for fish. The term is frequently abused to slander opponents in heated debates and is frequently misapplied to those who are ignorant of etiquette.

Trolling is often described as an online version of the breaching experiment, where social boundaries and rules of etiquette are broken. Self-proclaimed trolls often style themselves as Devil's Advocates or gadflies or culture jammers, challenging the dominant discourse and assumptions of the forum they are trolling in an attempt to subvert and introduce different ways of thinking. Detractors who value etiquette claim that true Devil's Advocates generally identify themselves as such for the sake of etiquette, whereas trolls often consider etiquette to be something worth trolling in order to fight groupthink.

Trolls are sometimes caricatured as socially inept. This is often due to the fundamental attribution error, as it is impossible to know the real traits of an individual solely from their online discourse. Indeed, since intentional trolls are alleged to knowingly flout social boundaries, it is difficult to typecast them as socially inept since they have arguably proven adept at their goal.

Have you given up your trolling days Jim? Good to hear, it was getting rather tedious, although this 'ownership' stage you're going through is becoming rather tiresome. l guess there's no point asking you to act yourself, or your age?

This is laughing with you Jim, it's too early in the morning to put my nasty hat on.