maybe he'll keep P.B as james bond...Originally Posted by {I}{K}{E}
maybe he'll keep P.B as james bond...Originally Posted by {I}{K}{E}
dude!!!
la cucaracha, la cucaracha, ya no puede caminar...
- JOIN our fold@home team...... something about genetics n' stuff
-i just had a pm conversation with MYSELF!!!......
...wow... that's sad
PB is gettin really old, logically there should be a new Bond. Logically.
Jeff Loomis: He's so good, he doesn't need to be dead to have a tribute.
Okay, literally he should be dead. But I'm saying that the actor who plays Bond should be someone new, not P.B., logically.
Jeff Loomis: He's so good, he doesn't need to be dead to have a tribute.
Explain why this is the logical thing to do then.Originally Posted by cpt_azad
To me it makes no sense to replace a successful actor in the role that people have come to accept as James Bond. Replacing Pierce Brosnan with somebody who might fail at the role seems distinctly illogical.
The age thing has no baring on the character as Sean Connery played Bond as a much older actor.
I say bring back Brosnan and make this the final film of the series, go out on a relative high.
Personally, I think Brosnan is teh best Bond followed by Connery. But trust me on this one, he's not up to the job (and if he is then I'll be really happy, trust me, I'd want him to stay on as Bond, it's what the director might to that's unsettling) as viewed by the industry. I only said it's logical because if Martin C. does direct he'll most likely try and cast someone new. And if Brosnan does end up doing it then I'm sure it'll turn out a hell of alot better than if someone else did it. Either way I'm checking it out, but you're right about one thing WithCheese, this "franchise" is getting old.
Jeff Loomis: He's so good, he doesn't need to be dead to have a tribute.
I read somewhere that P.B only wanted to play Bond again if Tarentino directed the movieOriginally Posted by ofbz
Last edited by {I}{K}{E}; 02-08-2005 at 09:36 AM.
Bookmarks