Yeah its almost like Norton hijacks your system itself. I tried version 7 or something a year or so ago and hated. It AVG looks much better but in tests didnt preform as well.Originally Posted by SnnY
Yeah its almost like Norton hijacks your system itself. I tried version 7 or something a year or so ago and hated. It AVG looks much better but in tests didnt preform as well.Originally Posted by SnnY
Originally Posted by SnnY
Ya snny that norton proctected recyled bin sucked . But its not included in NSW 2005 . My setup is NSW 2005 for the tools , and Symantec Corp for the antivirus. So far works fine .![]()
I am not a fan of nortons as it seems to be excessively heavy on resources. I have been testing avg on a spare machine that my daughter uses and it seems to work fine.
it’s an election with no Democrats, in one of the whitest states in the union, where rich candidates pay $35 for your votes. Or, as Republicans call it, their vision for the future.
Originally Posted by vidcc
In a test Norton missed 0 virii where as AVG missed a few thousand.
Sorry to deviate. But as I surmise, there are 2 questions posed. I will not restate them.
1. Avast! home edition is freeware & imo much better than the 2 mentioned.
2. Yes you must have a pf & xp's built-in is a pos. Sygate personal firewall is freeware & imo the best freeware firewall out there.
1) In the latest test Norton came out as one of only four Av's that detected and removed every Virii known of. Avast did not detect them all.Originally Posted by zapjb
2) He prob has a firewall and clearly isnt asking for one![]()
"the latest test"? I've seen a lot of tests, in some norton doesn't do as well.
I've seen tests where Norton, KAV, NOD and even avg would catch 100% too.
The best way to judge whether an av is good is to look at a lot of tests, if it generally does well, then it's prolly good.
I'm not sure if I've ever seen avast do exceptionally well, tho'.
Last edited by Snee; 02-12-2005 at 09:07 PM.
which test?Originally Posted by Peerzy
it’s an election with no Democrats, in one of the whitest states in the union, where rich candidates pay $35 for your votes. Or, as Republicans call it, their vision for the future.
Originally Posted by vidcc
Check back a few pages, i don't have the link but IKE posted a thread about it.
Bookmarks