Im gonna read this later![]()
*Removed for being gay
internet news suck bawls![]()
and the other runs a fairly dead forum with about 12 regular members. I can see why they would love to be allowed back on a much more popular forum, in spite of the fact that they claim otherwise.![]()
For what my opinion is worth, I don't believe it was Billy Dean.
I do think it could be David. He can't help but post nettyisms. He started lots of accounts at our forum, mostly pretending to be a member from here and aimed at discrediting other members from here and it was always obvious from the first post who it was. He is easy to imitate though.
Originally Posted by AussieSheila
So you don't think that my ban from R&C is not related to the appearance of Icebast?
No not moderated, banned.
Why banned? I didn't break a single rule.
Internet news could not crack a nut, much less a forum and the portrayal here is a pathetic caricature.
Rikk admitted that he would do this if he could, who's to say he can't or found someone who could.
Why do you think he is not responsible?
Rikk is looking more and more likely, too me.
Somebody is getting pretty scared and wants to shut me up, but only until 2007.
I can't even e-mail you, it is blocked.
Last edited by hobbes; 03-19-2005 at 04:41 AM.
Hey I miss all the fun . Too fucking lazy to read the whole thing ,but don't think its the kltechsupport crew they have way to much class for that !
Feel free to update me !![]()
Last edited by peat moss; 03-19-2005 at 03:52 AM.
You don't have to, it's his board. Possibly if someone came onto my board and said the things you said I would be tempted to ban them too.Originally Posted by hobbes
I gave David more chances than anyone I think. I talked him back onto the forum a few times. He blew it everytime. He really is that thick or deranged or something. It is just the sort of thing he would do. (Hire internet thugs) I don't believe he could do it himself, he was locked out of his own forum quite easily.Internet news could not crack a nut, much less a forum and the portrayal here is a pathetic caricature.
I have found absolutely nothing to suggest he's had anything to do with it and I am looking. I honestly don't think he did, he isn't quite as evil as you think, but nothing is impossible. I don't really know any of you. If I find anything that says he has I'm sure you will hear about it.Rikk admitted that he would do this if he could, who's to say he can't or found someone who could.
Why do you think he is not responsible?
Rikk is looking more and more likely, too me.
Somebody is getting pretty scared and wants to shut me up, but only until 2007.
That's not true. You emailed me yesterday at an address that has nothing to do with the Club.I can't even e-mail you, it is blocked.
Andie,Originally Posted by AussieSheila
The things I said were a response to his 3 consecutive posts blaming me and his vicious pm to be sure I knew about the thread. I didn't come to his board to accuse, I was invited, do you want the PM?
Why would you blame me?
You are the one who told him that I suspected him, and he spit the dummy.
You make it sound like my post came out of the blue. Oh, no. He requested
it.
Why do you think he didn't do it, when he very specifically said he would, if he could?
You don't think he tells the truth, do you?
He banned me because he is a coward and is afraid of the logic I provide for the confused.
When I attempted to e-mail you. I got an error message, why would I lie about that?
Last edited by hobbes; 03-19-2005 at 09:16 AM.
Hope that does not become a requirement in criminality. It would mean millions of suspects for every crime.Have you found anything to suggest he didn't![]()
![]()
The best way to keep a secret:- Tell everyone not to tell anyone.
Bookmarks