there are restrictions on alcohol but that isn't designed to kill people.Many could say alcohol is not necessary either and it should be banned.
please tell me. if guns aren't one of the things that should be banned what should?I would never propose to suddenly ban something (in most cases) when other options have not been applied.
rights aren't really being trampled on. you're stopping someone having a weapon when there's a suspicion that they would use it, until you can prove they aren't going to use it for criminal activities. it's not like america has never done pre-emptive security measures that infringe on their rights before.Do you really think I want a maniac to come over here and NOT be regarded as such? Of course not. I also do not want a person's rights trampled upon due to an idiosyncrasy of a foreign country as relates to America. If they got a shit deal there it'll carryover here.
like i said, check the mentality. law abiding citizens here don't want guns. if you were to have one there would most likely be a sinister reason.You don't allow guns in UK. If I simply have a gun there that doesn't necessarily make me a danger to America.
i can't decipher this to put it downRegarding gun related deaths here, I wouldn't get rid o them all but shit, almost anyone is allowed to get one. I can buy a shotgun without a background check ffs. Your main point shouldn't less gun related deaths but less homicides which of course you have. If your homicide rate remained the same then guns weren't the real issue.![]()
Bookmarks