Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 22

Thread: thermal pad vs thermal paste....

  1. #1
    fkdup74's Avatar Pneuberator.
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    3,554
    having a discussion in soulseek....
    help teh cause

    thermal pad vs thermal paste for CPUs
    pros & cons, which is better, etc.

    plz & TY

  2. Software & Hardware   -   #2
    clocker's Avatar Shovel Ready
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    15,305
    While I'm sure it's possible to develop a high quality thermal pad, I have yet to see it.
    Thermal paste is where the good stuff ends up.

    Paste>pads.
    "I am the one who knocks."- Heisenberg

  3. Software & Hardware   -   #3
    Storm's Avatar Poster BT Rep: +3
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    crazy skiing monkey
    Posts
    1,316
    paste is better as a cooler......... pads are cheaper.........

    paste will get you a couple of degrees improvement........

    pads are easier to apply (just stick em on), while paste can be quite a hassle to get it in a thin layer (in my experience)
    Last edited by Storm; 04-28-2005 at 02:13 AM.

  4. Software & Hardware   -   #4
    Formula1's Avatar Poster
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    2,800
    I think thermal paste works alot better than thermal pad. It ensures better/more contact between the hsf and the cpu. My original atlhon with the stock hsf had higher temps, compared to the one i have now.

  5. Software & Hardware   -   #5
    bigdawgfoxx's Avatar Big Dawg
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Texas
    Age
    35
    Posts
    3,821
    I always use paste
    [SIZE=1]AMD 4200 X2 @ 2.65Ghz, ASRock 939-VSTA
    1.75GB PC3200, 2 X 160GB Seagate w/ 8MB Buffer
    HIS Radeon X800 Pro, Antec Super Lanboy Aluminum

  6. Software & Hardware   -   #6
    GepperRankins's Avatar we want your oil!
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    the suburbs. honestment
    Age
    38
    Posts
    8,527
    pate fills our gOP SO YOU GET UBER COAVER AGE. BICANT IMAGINBR THAT EFFUACIANCY FROM ASLOIC :BKINL@

  7. Software & Hardware   -   #7
    clocker's Avatar Shovel Ready
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    15,305
    Definitely.
    "I am the one who knocks."- Heisenberg

  8. Software & Hardware   -   #8
    zapjb's Avatar Computer Abuser BT Rep: +3
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    3,606
    Pads never have to be reapplied. Paste, I've heard it's recommended to reapply every so often.

  9. Software & Hardware   -   #9
    GepperRankins's Avatar we want your oil!
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    the suburbs. honestment
    Age
    38
    Posts
    8,527
    i meant paste fills out so you get coverage, therefore, i imagine it's more efficiant

  10. Software & Hardware   -   #10
    fkdup74's Avatar Pneuberator.
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    3,554
    Quote Originally Posted by zapjb
    Pads never have to be reapplied. Paste, I've heard it's recommended to reapply every so often.
    never? never ever?
    ok, back to the point I raised with jonno in slsk,
    after he tried pullin this number on me:
    [studly] other puter same spec as mine with good pad runs at 28c
    [fkdup74] i doubt that seriously
    my question.....if pads were so great, and I doubt they are,
    (I tend to lean clocker's way on this, as he/she works in a shop,
    and no doubtedly sees more of this in a week than most of us do in a year)
    how would paste even find a place on shops' shelves?
    it just wouldn't sell, at all, except maybe for system testing

    and, you cant re-use a pad, that's bad practice
    where as if you have a tube of paste,
    you uncap the tube, re-apply a layer of paste, done
    don't have to be a 10-15 dollar tube of AS5
    can be a 3-5 dollar tube of the ole silicone paste
    (in fact I havent really found AS5 to be that great)

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •