a couple thing you could try...
you could upgrade your java to version 1.50_3
you could downgrade azureus back to 2.2.0.0
a couple thing you could try...
you could upgrade your java to version 1.50_3
you could downgrade azureus back to 2.2.0.0
Originally Posted by Vargas
thnx.... upgrading java worked fine
sig removed.
its workin fine over here...
"I'll be here... I'll be 'waiting'...here... I'll be waiting... for you ... so... If you come here... You'll find me. I promise..."
its funny how all the forums, news sites and slashdot are posting about the new DHT decentralized database.
but i posted about it over a month ago
https://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/showthread.php?t=92131
LOL
Has anyone figured out how to fix the problem with new azureus and NOD32? It gives me 100% CPU usage.
sig removed.
Beware those of you looking to upgrade to this new version, its been banned on several private trackers already![]()
when making torrents you can select "connections from the tracker only" for private trackers, so people can't hitchhike on to private trackers.Originally Posted by RPerry
or allow DHT for "not so private" trackers
Yes, the creators of Azureus figured it out.Originally Posted by aizlumzan
http://azureus.sourceforge.net/2200/cpu_usage.php
i'm beginning to think that all bittorrent apps are moving towards this peer-sharing-something feature that the private trackers loathe about.Originally Posted by RPerry
first it was bitcomet, now it's azureus.
so why can't they just fix their tracker to adapt to this feature? what if every bittorrent prog out there adopts this feature?
gildan2020
Please be kind to the noobs...we were once them after all
does anybody know if its compliant with all the stats on torrent sites?
Bookmarks