Member
Good work indeed....So you lost some seats in commons. Whatever
Another British pawn/figurehead/lapdog P.M. to serve "our{USA}" wishes in the Middle East cesspool.
I sincerely wish you all the best in your future endevours. You all must understand that U really are our {the Mighty USA} pawns
in this whole scheme.
American here: Bow down!!!!!
there is no god
I feel that your post doesn't deserve serious debate.
it’s an election with no Democrats, in one of the whitest states in the union, where rich candidates pay $35 for your votes. Or, as Republicans call it, their vision for the future.
we want your oil!
it does. tony blair is a dick. i don't suppose howard would have been much better though
we want your oil!
to be fair. i don't know an intelligent labour voter (though i'm thinking maybe manker voted for themOriginally Posted by j2k4
From the election one may conclude, with no argument, that aggregate support for Blair is in excess of any other viable party/candidate in your fair Kingdom.
What this means, very simply, is that a majority (albeit only a political majority) thinks Blair is the best bet, and that those who oppose him are in a (political) minority, which is to say that there are more of them then there are of you.
Are any of you nay-sayers of a mind to respect this fact, or are you inclined to think Blair-supporters doody-heads not worth your time-of-day?
In other words, are they less worthy of respect than gays?
How about if they were gay, in addition to being doody-headed oppositionists?), or one that read anything other than what rupert murdock wanted them too
edit: so yeah, you're wrong, because the politically minded {presuming that what "(political)" means} majority is against labour
Last edited by GepperRankins; 05-07-2005 at 08:17 PM.
Poster
BT Rep: +1
From the election one may conclude, with no argument, that aggregate support for Blair is in excess of any other viable party/candidate in your fair Kingdom.
What this means, very simply, is that a majority (albeit only a political majority) thinks Blair is the best bet, and that those who oppose him are in a (political) minority, which is to say that there are more of them then there are of you.
Are any of you nay-sayers of a mind to respect this fact, or are you inclined to think Blair-supporters doody-heads not worth your time-of-day?
In other words, are they less worthy of respect than gays?
How about if they were gay, in addition to being doody-headed oppositionists?
The final statistics are not yet out. But Blairs share of the vote is about 33%. That allows him to lead this country for the next five years.One third of the voters elected his party. How can this be democracy? Could you explain that to a 5 year old? No I am not the five year old.
Gay? Your fellow countryman answered that.
The day I bend to the colonies will be my last.American here: Bow down!!!!!
The best way to keep a secret:- Tell everyone not to tell anyone.
Broken
No there isnt.which is to say that there are more of them then there are of you.
The constituancies are such that the Conservatives would have had to pool approx 10% more of the votes to get the same number of seats as Labour.
Add to this the Postal Ballot scandal, and the fact most of the Armed Services mysteriously lost their right to vote in this election due to an administrative mixup.. well, you do the math.
He was elected by less people that voted Labour in the 1992(?) defeat of that party under the welsh sod, as an example... something like 31% of the electorate, if i remember correctly.
As it happens, its probably the result we wanted and no way on earth could have organised... Labour in power (because we want this Chancellor for the economy), but Blairs power somewhat curtailed, in that he cannot now ride roughshod over Parliament. His days as PM are probably numbered, and i welcome the time Mr Brown takes over..except, well I like that guy as Chancellor..who could replace him there?
The politics of this country are different from your own. Mr Blaire has lost a lot of power within his own Party, Mr Brown has gained that power.. in Party Polical terms.
There is enough backbench opposition in his own Party that contravertial policies will have a rough time making it through, so we may not now get those bloody stupid ID cards he's so keen on, for example. Beforehand, even opposition in his own party could not overcome his Majority of sheep and Lapdogs.
Im very satisfied that the Newcatle area has overnight been transformed from a "Labour Heartland" into a number of Labour Marginal Seats... "Swing States" in American-Speak.
For the 1st time ever, my vote actually matters now..
Last edited by Rat Faced; 05-07-2005 at 08:31 PM.
An It Harm None, Do What You Will
we want your oil!
i live in a "labour heartland". i reckon billboards saying "DO YOU EVEN KNOW WHY YOU VOTE LABOUR?" would be more effective than a pic of charles kennedy's ugly mug, that provided an independent thought can be provoked.
incase you haven't noticed i've come to the conclusion that most labour voters don't know why they vote
Broken
I did my bit getting us to be a marginal..
With our LibDem council doing more in the last year than the Labour council did in the 15 years prior, and having the Lowest increase in Council Tax since it was brought in to too...
...maybe more of my neighbours will see the light next time
An It Harm None, Do What You Will
we want your oil!
convince them. i'm scared i might stop washing and become a political activist
I did my bit getting us to be a marginal..
With our LibDem council doing more in the last year than the Labour council did in the 15 years prior, and having the Lowest increase in Council Tax since it was brought in to too...
...maybe more of my neighbours will see the light next time
Broken
Dont want to convince them too much, until more Conservatives die of old age or terminal stupidity...
The only thing that scares me more than an unfettered Blaire, is the Tories winning power again.
An It Harm None, Do What You Will
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
), or one that read anything other than what rupert murdock wanted them too 
One third of the voters elected his party. How can this be democracy? Could you explain that to a 5 year old? No I am not the five year old. 
Bookmarks