What i ment was that he would get play time at Madrid, everyone knows that but because he's seen Owen he might doubt his chances and because they havn't won anything for 2 years its not really in keeping with his dreams to win more trophy's. He has a far bigger chance of winning the Champions League with Chelsea than Madrid.
Fat Secret Agent
Agreed.Originally Posted by manker
I only suggest Barca as they are on a bit of a roll just now, La Ligawise and may wish to consolodate this.
Tho' as you say the capital expenditure may be a problem. However if they could spread the debt who knows.
As an aside t'Hoops have now removed the players, as assets, from their books. They reduced it by £8,000,000 a year and the financial year just gone (FYE 30/06) was the last year to get the player / asset value to nil.
This to me is a good thang.
Fat Secret Agent
He's already won the Champions League mate, he wants domestic honours.
He's already won the Champions League mate, he wants domestic honours.
I know, i ment again. If you think Chelsea have a bigger chance than Real in winning their respected leagues.
Barca are far stronger than Real and the Real team isn't gaining any years.
Just what i think anyways
effendi
As a purist, I have to disagree
However, I didn't know they were doing that. It's pretty difficult, as a plc, to be able to change policy like that. The shareholders usually cause problems and vote against it. Good on them tho' as it will mean that the P&L will be more representative of how the club's doing as a whole.
A few years ago Man Utd were the only quoted English club to be able to represent their players like this, the financial folk o other clubs wanted their liquidity ratios boosted to encourage investmen. Tho' this did change recently - and prior to the Glazing incident come to think of it. Wonder if it's related ... .
Btw, if I had to choose and it couldn't be Man Utd, I'd want him to go to Barca. They'd be awesome.
I plan on beating him to death with his kids. I'll use them as a bludgeon on his face. -
--Good for them if they survive.
Fat Secret Agent
As a purist accountant or football fanAs a purist, I have to disagree
However, I didn't know they were doing that. It's pretty difficult, as a plc, to be able to change policy like that. The shareholders usually cause problems and vote against it. Good on them tho' as it will mean that the P&L will be more representative of how the club's doing as a whole.
A few years ago Man Utd were the only quoted English club to be able to represent their players like this, the financial folk o other clubs wanted their liquidity ratios boosted to encourage investmen. Tho' this did change recently - and prior to the Glazing incident come to think of it. Wonder if it's related ... .
Btw, if I had to choose and it couldn't be Man Utd, I'd want him to go to Barca. They'd be awesome.(Feck I forgot to put the word which in that sentence, maybe she didn't notice)
To me not having the players "value" included is more realistic. Tho' I can see why accountants would want to.
Disingenuous bar stewards.
effendi
Indeed
I plan on beating him to death with his kids. I'll use them as a bludgeon on his face. -
--Good for them if they survive.
Fat Secret Agent
It appears that Gerrard Stevens is now staying at Liv'pool. According to Rick Parry there was a bit of a misunderstanding, but he has apologised and they are all pals again.
effendi
What a fucking geptard
I plan on beating him to death with his kids. I'll use them as a bludgeon on his face. -
--Good for them if they survive.
mostly harmless
He's beginning to look like a bit of a nob now...
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
(Feck I forgot to put the word which in that sentence, maybe she didn't notice)
Bookmarks