Page 8 of 16 FirstFirst ... 567891011 ... LastLast
Results 71 to 80 of 160

Thread: BattleField 2

  1. #71
    what do I put here? BT Rep: +10BT Rep +10
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Australia N.S.W
    Age
    43
    Posts
    10,878
    i love my new PC will be able to play this nice

  2. Games   -   #72
    Retired
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    12,488
    Battlefield 2 Dedicated Server Public Server Patch-SUSPECTS

    Copy over the dedicated server executable included in this release, and
    start a server. We suggest you put "Cracked" in the name or something so the
    clients will know to join you server

  3. Games   -   #73
    GepperRankins's Avatar we want your oil!
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    the suburbs. honestment
    Age
    39
    Posts
    8,527
    i wonder if i'd even be able to get on TPB before friday? or would my pre-order be delivered first?

  4. Games   -   #74
    Gotta love it...this game is awesome

  5. Games   -   #75
    BawA's Avatar FST Pioneer BT Rep: +1
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Some Where but not here
    Age
    42
    Posts
    4,213
    BFV is way better, i could play it with high setting but in BF2 i get latency on Low setting.
    game play is bad and graphics r even worst even tho my Spec good(R9600 pro, 867DDR2). Extremly Fast aircrafts for such a small maps, u cant get enough time to take your shots, Chopper Control was damn good at BFV but its way screwed in this part. the only thing i like was weaponary.
    why every game cant be Optimized like Half Life2 so it can be played at high setting with no Lagging, serioucly game with such high graphics was amazing to have no latency.
    Last edited by bawa@Klite_user; 06-22-2005 at 12:46 PM.


    "You can be mad as a mad dog at the way things went; you can swear and curse the fates, but when it comes to the end, you have to let go"
    Benjamen button

  6. Games   -   #76
    GepperRankins's Avatar we want your oil!
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    the suburbs. honestment
    Age
    39
    Posts
    8,527
    seriously?

    i've noticed the opposite. it plays smoother and looks better then BF:vietnam and desert combat, even though my settings are still mostly medium.

    i'm ready to go down on them for the engine overhaul, but if it turns out only gulf of oman has been refined they get no sex from me until there's a patch


    i hope the deliver it on friday, not just post it

  7. Games   -   #77
    Quote Originally Posted by bawa@Klite_user
    BFV is way better, i could play it with high setting but in BF2 i get latency on Low setting.
    game play is bad and graphics r even worst even tho my Spec good(R9600 pro, 867DDR2). Extremly Fast aircrafts for such a small maps, u cant get enough time to take your shots, Chopper Control was damn good at BFV but its way screwed in this part. the only thing i like was weaponary.
    why every game cant be Optimized like Half Life2 so it can be played at high setting with no Lagging, serioucly game with such high graphics was amazing to have no latency.

    So BFV is "way better" because you could "play it with high settings"

    So basically this game is crap because your computer isn't good enough

    You can play with the Public Server Patch, although you don't even need to right now. EA havn't activated there authentication servers because the game isn't out yet you can play online as much as you want before you need to move over to the cracker servers in a few days. Nice idea of EA gives pirates a chance to play the full game online before attempting to cut them off and make them buy.


  8. Games   -   #78
    GepperRankins's Avatar we want your oil!
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    the suburbs. honestment
    Age
    39
    Posts
    8,527
    i don't understand. i have a radeon 9600 pro too

    1 gig of RAM

    athlon 3000+


    and it plays perfect, on medium settings. high settings give my pc something to aspire too

    gamespot hardware tests suggest it isn't the processor that does the hardwork either - http://hardware.gamespot.com/Story-ST-x-2147-x-x-x

  9. Games   -   #79
    BawA's Avatar FST Pioneer BT Rep: +1
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Some Where but not here
    Age
    42
    Posts
    4,213
    BFV didnt had this much mobility and weaponary in it and its 1.90Gb BF2 with almsot 3 time more stuff is still same size, obviously they didnt pay much efforts in it(even less).
    both game engines r same why should an older version be so good and newer version be with less proformence and grpahics(using same hardware).
    Last edited by bawa@Klite_user; 06-22-2005 at 01:39 PM.


    "You can be mad as a mad dog at the way things went; you can swear and curse the fates, but when it comes to the end, you have to let go"
    Benjamen button

  10. Games   -   #80
    Quote Originally Posted by GepperRankins
    i don't understand. i have a radeon 9600 pro too

    1 gig of RAM

    athlon 3000+


    and it plays perfect, on medium settings. high settings give my pc something to aspire too

    gamespot hardware tests suggest it isn't the processor that does the hardwork either - http://hardware.gamespot.com/Story-ST-x-2147-x-x-x

    Thing is Bawa's pc sounds like a piece of shit anyway, half the games he says play so dakr he can hardly see them. Havn't tested it yet on my pc, might install later just have to have quick go online as i've never played any of the Battlefield series.


Page 8 of 16 FirstFirst ... 567891011 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •